Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Author Archives: Gerald Barnett
How Bayh-Dole Is Intended to Work, circa 1992, Part 2
We are working through a paragraph from a law review article from 1992, taken perhaps out of context, but setting out how Bayh-Dole was “intended” to work. Our problem is not so much with the law professor who wrote the … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet
Tagged 15 USC 2218(d), Bayh-Dole, blackbirds, fantasy, intention
Comments Off on How Bayh-Dole Is Intended to Work, circa 1992, Part 2
How Bayh-Dole Is Intended to Work, circa 1992, Part 1
I found a passage quoted from an article from 1992 in Wisconsin Law Review–“Faculty Generated Inventions: Who Owns the Golden Egg?” by Pat K. Chew, a distinguished law professor now at the University of Pittsburgh. Chew describes how Bayh-Dole is … Continue reading
Invention Option Theory and Bayh-Dole Crock Work
At one point, many years ago, I thought Bayh-Dole was totally clever. I was very wrong, but here’s how I thought Bayh-Dole worked. The federal government had a general claim under federal law to own any invention made under federal … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, History
Tagged Bayh-Dole, blueberries, crock, elect, IPA, option
Comments Off on Invention Option Theory and Bayh-Dole Crock Work
Fantasy depictions of technology transfer, 3
Despite all this discussion of university fantasy depictions of a technology transfer process, their invocation of the Bayh-Dole Act as their justification, and the reality that actual practice is nowhere like their depictions of process, success, or history, there are … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Policy
Tagged 35 USC 287, ants, Bayh-Dole, Dean Baker, repeal
Comments Off on Fantasy depictions of technology transfer, 3
Fantasy depictions of technology transfer, 2
The standard accounts of the “technology transfer process” seem so clear and plausible that you may well believe they are generally accurate, even if there might be “technical details” that they gloss over. But these standard accounts are largely, almost … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Policy
Tagged AUTM, commercialization, counterfactual, process, technology transfer
Comments Off on Fantasy depictions of technology transfer, 2
Fantasy depictions of technology transfer
People play innovation policy with stick drawings. Inventions are depicted as proto-products rather than as broad swaths of potential. According to the stick drawings, patents “protect” inventions from competing uses that would simultaneously discourage private investment in “developing” the inventions … Continue reading
Posted in Technology Transfer
Tagged diagrams, fantasy, process, technology transfer
Comments Off on Fantasy depictions of technology transfer
On reasonable terms
Here is the definition of to the point of practical application in the Federal Procurement Regulation, finalized in 1975, just five years before Bayh-Dole (41 CFR 1-9.107-5(a)(5)): “To the point of practical application” means to manufacture in the case of … Continue reading
The FPR criteria for invention ownership–2
We are talking the proposed goals for federal policy on the disposition of inventions made in projects worthy of federal support, circa 1973, by way of a Department of Commerce committee report. The report recommended as goals for deciding ownership … Continue reading
The FPR criteria for invention ownership–1
In June 1973, The Executive Subcommittee of the Federal Council for Science and Technology’s Committee on Government Patent Policy at the U.S. Department of Commerce, tasked with the codification of the patent policy established by President Nixon, made the following … Continue reading
Posted in History, Policy
Tagged availability, Bayh-Dole, expeditious, Federal Procurement Regulations
Comments Off on The FPR criteria for invention ownership–1
Patent rights follow-up: from the FPR to BD–2
We are working through the Federal Procurement Regulations (1975) advice with regard to the exercise of rights in inventions made in projects receiving federal support. We have looked at the first part of the opening statement and made the point … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy
Tagged Bayh-Dole, expeditious, Federal Procurement Regulations
Comments Off on Patent rights follow-up: from the FPR to BD–2