Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Bad Science
Research administrators protest indirect cost changes
The NIH has proposed to set the indirect cost rate for its grants at 15%. There’s the usual outrage. I don’t feel that outrage, however. I don’t even feel a desire to preserve the present approach to federally supported research. … Continue reading
Government Funding For Research, 1
Out in Twitterland, I saw this tweet by Brett Blackham: Arguably, research and development is so important that government should have nothing to do with it. However since 1980 a company or university could get government money to do research … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science, Innovation, Sponsored Research
Tagged government funding, research
Comments Off on Government Funding For Research, 1
Federal agency patent enforcement under Bayh-Dole, 6
Bayh-Dole devotes two sections to federal disposition of patents, 35 USC 207 and 209. These sections are then codified at 37 CFR 404. There, the regulations limit the scope of Bayh-Dole (37 CFR 404.2): It is the policy and objective … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science
Tagged Bayh-Dole, enforcement
Comments Off on Federal agency patent enforcement under Bayh-Dole, 6
Illusions of Bayh-Dole: the bathos of university practice, 2
We are working through a report on a workshop discussion of the “manufactured substantially” provision in Bayh-Dole (35 USC 204). Now we get to a rich part of Schwartz’s discussion, actual university practice: Because Johns Hopkins has applied for and … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science
Comments Off on Illusions of Bayh-Dole: the bathos of university practice, 2
Vice presidents for research beg for Directive 10-289.
Here’s a bit from the APLU/AAU fakographic on university technology transfer: And here’s a bit from “‘Miracle machine of U.S. innovation is in danger,” a new op/ed by Kelvin Droegemeier and Daniel Reed. Droegemeier is the vice president for research at … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science, Metrics, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Tagged basic research, Directive 289, Iowa, Oklahoma
Comments Off on Vice presidents for research beg for Directive 10-289.
The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 10
This series starts here: The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 1 Medicinal chemistry drives the whole of federal patent policy The IPA program, revived in 1968 by the NIH following the Harbridge House report, which singled out medicinal chemistry … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science, History, Policy, Sponsored Research
Tagged 5-FU, Bayh-Dole, capital, commons, PHS, public interest, WARF
Comments Off on The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 10
Boiling away “Why Bayh-Dole”
The basis of the patent system is individual inventor rights. Bayh-Dole strips these in favor of institutional exploitation. Bayh-Dole is inventor loathing. The results are terrible. Commercialization rates are 1/1oth what they were before Bayh-Dole. Bayh-Dole has created tens of … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science
Comments Off on Boiling away “Why Bayh-Dole”
Saving Bush
Over at the Science of Science Policy discussion group, there was a brief flurry regarding Dan Sarewitz’s article in The New Atlantis, “Saving Science.” Here is what I posted in that discussion: Militaristic research directors demanding disciplined obedience don’t appear … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science, History
Comments Off on Saving Bush
Vannevar Bush’s seductive lie
At The New Atlantis, Dan Sarewitz has published an interesting article, “Saving Science.” While there’s plenty to discuss regarding his major theme, that scientists “must come out of the lab into the real world,” here I’d like to deal with a … Continue reading
Look, It's a Thrush!
One of the biggest problems in dealing with university technology transfer is the propensity for people to reason from the names given to things, rather than what the things are. In biology, a truism is that one cannot reason from … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science, Bayh-Dole, Freedom, Policy
Comments Off on Look, It's a Thrush!