Category Archives: Policy

Undermining Bayh-Dole by relying on it? 1

Posted on March 10, 2022 by Gerald Barnett

I feel like Charlie Chaplin in a pie factory. Before I could work through an op/ed by Niels Reimers in the Mercury News last April (2021) that the Bayh-Dole Coalition has dredged up to contest the use of march-in to … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Commons, Policy, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Undermining Bayh-Dole by relying on it? 1

Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Step 5

Posted on February 14, 2022 by Gerald Barnett

We have been working through five steps to restore a university’s IP practice to something that. might be modestly effective. Abandon AUTM, which has worked for decades against effective IP policy and practices. Abandon compulsory university ownership claims. You may … Continue reading →

Posted in Freedom, Policy, Sponsored Research | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Step 5

Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Step 4

Posted on February 12, 2022 by Gerald Barnett

We are working through five steps to getting a university back to an effective IP practice, a practice aligned with academic values and focused on actual technology transfer. The idea of “technology transfer” is bureaucratic in origin. As a concept … Continue reading →

Posted in History, Policy, Sponsored Research | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Step 4

Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Step 3

Posted on February 11, 2022 by Gerald Barnett

We are working through five steps to restoring your university IP practice to something effective and conscionable. The third step involves a fundamental, but again simple, change in policy. Current IP policy at most universities does not address non-exclusive and … Continue reading →

Posted in Freedom, Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Step 3

Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Steps 1 and 2

Posted on February 10, 2022 by Gerald Barnett

Over the past couple of years, I have been involved in projects based in the idea of commons for the exchange of research and diagnostic assets. These projects have been blocked or resisted at each point by organizational technology transfer … Continue reading →

Posted in Freedom, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Five Steps to Restoring an Effective University IP Practice, Steps 1 and 2

Latkerstein’s Monster, 2

Posted on February 5, 2022 by Gerald Barnett

The monopoly meme argument is that no one would have ever received any cisplatin if not for an exclusive license to motivate a big drug company to “develop” the drug as a product. Left out is the idea that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Latkerstein’s Monster, 2

Latkerstein’s Monster, 1

Posted on February 4, 2022 by Gerald Barnett

I ran a Twitter thread on this topic. Here’s more of the same. The Bayh-Dole Coalition describes Bayh-Dole as part of a “delicate balance of the university techtransfer system.” My experience differs. There is no “delicate balance.” Bayh-Dole is a … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Latkerstein’s Monster, 1

Why the NIH fuss with Moderna over inventorship doesn’t matter, but does

Posted on November 9, 2021 by Gerald Barnett

The New York Times ran a story today that Moderna and the NIH are having a spat over inventorship on a patent application covering aspects of the Moderna mRNA vaccine. The N.I.H. had been in talks with Moderna for more … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Why the NIH fuss with Moderna over inventorship doesn’t matter, but does

The use of the patent system for federal research results, 13: The failed middle ground

Posted on September 29, 2021 by Gerald Barnett

We’ve looked at the early Federal Security Administration policy on inventions made in federally contracted work–FSA order 110-1, issued in 1952. The government’s policy as set forth in David Lloyd Kreeger’s report for the Attorney General in 1947 was that … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Vannever Bush | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The use of the patent system for federal research results, 13: The failed middle ground

The use of the patent system for federal research results, 11: Safeguards that don’t guard

Posted on August 18, 2021 by Gerald Barnett

We have been working through Federal Security Agency order 110-1, which in 1952 introduced an agency-wide policy for inventions made in public health research. The core of the policy was to prefer open access for all such inventions, but then … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The use of the patent system for federal research results, 11: Safeguards that don’t guard