Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Metrics
UW’s Fast Start template, a bad bureaucratic idea gone bad, 1
GeekWire ran an article recently announcing that the University of Washington has “unveiled” a new licensing scheme for startups: “Univ. of Washington rolls out new licensing process to streamline negotiations with spinouts.” Let’s work through this article and see what … Continue reading
Posted in Metrics, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged C4C, clownshow, FAST, spinout, startup, University of Washington, UW
Comments Off on UW’s Fast Start template, a bad bureaucratic idea gone bad, 1
University Patent Policy for Effective Technology Transfer, 4: The Eat and Fart Model
No one in their right mind reads a book primarily because it has a copyright. “Gosh, all these books in the public domain–I need to find one with a solid, enforced copyright!” Similarly, technologists with stable brains do not seek … Continue reading
On Technology Transfer Metrics, 6: What university administrators want most
We are looking at metrics for managing university-based technology transfer and policy. First, we have none. We have disconnected proxies that don’t inform either management or policy. Let’s look at what university administrators care about: money. That’s it. I have … Continue reading
On Technology Transfer Metrics, 5: Metrics relative to mission
Who it is that most wants technology change. Or, more particularly, who is it that we ought to want to make technology change? My bet is that the top of that list is not occupied by patent bureaucrats. It’s not, … Continue reading
Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer
Tagged bureaucrats, metrics, technology change, technology transfer
Comments Off on On Technology Transfer Metrics, 5: Metrics relative to mission
On Technology Transfer Metrics, 4: Technology transfer and technology change
We have been talking university technology transfer metrics. First, that there aren’t any metrics. No one bothers to collect them or report them. Instead we get proxies of activity–number of patents, number of licenses. Once one has patents, then one … Continue reading
Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer
Tagged bureaucrats, metrics, technology change, technology transfer
Comments Off on On Technology Transfer Metrics, 4: Technology transfer and technology change
On Technology Transfer Metrics, 3: Money
Universities don’t track their transfers, the federal government does not track university transfers, and professional organizations and nonprofits do not track university transfers. Law firms don’t track university transfers. Venture capital firms don’t track university transfers. Pretty much anyone who … Continue reading
On Technology Transfer Metrics, 2: Management
There are uses for metrics in business. One is to make management decisions. There’s a repeated bit of nonsense–you can’t manage what you don’t measure. There’s a veneer of truth in that, along the lines of “if you measure it, … Continue reading
Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer
Tagged license, management, metrics
Comments Off on On Technology Transfer Metrics, 2: Management
On Technology Transfer Metrics, 1: Issues
Let’s follow up on the fact that there’s no publicly available–free–data source to track university to industry technology transfer. There’s no non-free data source to track such transfer, either. You would think there would be. To get at metrics, let’s … Continue reading
Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer
Tagged AUTM, licensing, metrics, money, technology transfer
Comments Off on On Technology Transfer Metrics, 1: Issues
NIST’s “substantially fueled” premise for unleashing innovation
Here is a claim from the opening of a recent NIST report–1234–on “Unleashing American Innovation,” a “draft green paper”: The U.S. innovation system is substantially fueled by the discoveries and inventions arising from federally funded R&D at the Nation’s universities, … Continue reading
Posted in Innovation, Metrics, Policy
Tagged innovation, NIST, patents, research
Comments Off on NIST’s “substantially fueled” premise for unleashing innovation
Nine Points to Consider (with regard to AUTM’s licensing survey), 8-9
We are considering nine points with regard to AUTM’s annual licensing survey. We have got through seven points–not validated and with estimates, duplicate reporting, conflating technology and invention, activity measures giving the illusion of a process at work, no reporting … Continue reading