Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Tag Archives: IPA
Undermining Bayh-Dole by relying on it? 2
We are working through an op/ed published in April 2021 by Niels Reimers, one of the recognized university TLO leaders from the 1970s on. We are working through it now because the Bayh-Dole Coalition is using quotes from it to … Continue reading
Latkerstein’s Monster, 1
I ran a Twitter thread on this topic. Here’s more of the same. The Bayh-Dole Coalition describes Bayh-Dole as part of a “delicate balance of the university techtransfer system.” My experience differs. There is no “delicate balance.” Bayh-Dole is a … Continue reading
The use of the patent system for federal research results, 2: Why universities patent
For an account that covers reasonably well the context for universities getting involved in patenting, see Elizabeth Popp Berman’s 2006 paper “Why Do Universities Patent? The Role of the Federal Government in Creating Modern Technology Transfer Practice” (draft here). What … Continue reading
Senator Nelson on the problem of “public interest” in federal patent policy, 1
The “public interest” plays an important role in federal invention policy. In 1963, President Kennedy announced a policy that permitted nonprofit organizations to request to retain title to inventions made in federally funded work, providing that Where the commercial interests … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Vannever Bush
Tagged Bayh-Dole, IPA, Nelson, patent policy, public interest
Comments Off on Senator Nelson on the problem of “public interest” in federal patent policy, 1
Being blunt about Bayh-Dole operations, 2
Under Bayh-Dole, a federal contractor has no special right, and no obligation, to take ownership of inventions arising in federally supported research or development. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, in Bayh-Dole that suggests that Congress had any intention to make … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History
Tagged (f)(2), Bayh-Dole, FPR, IPA, reasonable interpretation, written agreement
Comments Off on Being blunt about Bayh-Dole operations, 2
The IPA and Bayh-Dole on nonprofit assignment of subject inventions, 4
Well, now we can look at Bayh-Dole’s nonprofit assignment provision. It’s in Bayh-Dole’s specification for what must be included in a patent rights clause that runs with any funding agreement with a nonprofit or small business. Here, 35 USC 202(c)(7)(A): … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged assignment, Bayh-Dole, IPA
Comments Off on The IPA and Bayh-Dole on nonprofit assignment of subject inventions, 4
The IPA and Bayh-Dole on nonprofit assignment of subject inventions, 3
We are working through the approaches of the IPA master and Bayh-Dole’s standard patent rights clause to the assignment of inventions by nonprofit organizations. Unlike the IPA, which was a federal master contract made with selected organizations, Bayh-Dole is a … Continue reading
The IPA and Bayh-Dole on nonprofit assignment of subject inventions, 2
We have looked at the IPA assignment clause. Since the IPA is specific to nonprofits, there’s no reason to call out nonprofitedness. But there is a reason then to restrict any later invention assignment to nonprofit assignees. Why? The point … Continue reading
The IPA and Bayh-Dole on nonprofit assignment of subject inventions, 1
Norman Latker, patent counsel at the NIH, drafted Bayh-Dole on the sly, working against HEW policy on inventions to create an easier pathway by which nonprofits could pass exclusive control of inventions made in work receiving NIH funding to the … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History
Tagged assignment, Bayh-Dole, CNIOSI, IPA, Latker, subject invention
Comments Off on The IPA and Bayh-Dole on nonprofit assignment of subject inventions, 1
The Turning Point in Federal Patent Policy
1971. Here’s where things started to go bad. In 1963, President Kennedy issued a memorandum setting forth executive branch patent policy. When the federal government acquired inventions, the policy stipulated that patents would be made available “through dedication or licensing”–that … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Freedom, History, Policy
Tagged exclusive license, IPA, Kennedy, Latker, Nixon, patent policy
Comments Off on The Turning Point in Federal Patent Policy