Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Tag Archives: Bayh-Dole
Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-2
Now we get to government rights under march in. Here we have complications. In 1968, Norman Latker, NIH’s patent counsel, revived the Institutional Patent Agreement program, under which the NIH (and later the NSF) contracted with nonprofits so that a … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Bayh-Dole, development, exclusive license, IPA, Latker, march-in, master agreement
Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-2
Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-1
This will be longish. It’s a document of the details. In a world where people spout TL;DR for most any issue of substance, and want a sound bite to gulp instead, this ain’t it. Perhaps we can get all brief … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History
Tagged Bayh-Dole, Kennedy patent policy, march-in
Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-1
Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms
[Short: There are two “reasonable” terms in Bayh-Dole. The first has to do with reasonable terms on offer to the public. These terms, including price, are the terms a reasonable person would expect if there were competition, even if a … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, march-in, practical application, reasonable terms
Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms
Bayh-Dole is thin soup when it comes to federal innovation policy
NIST wants march-in for Bayh-Dole’s section 203(a)(2) and (3) to be for “national emergencies” only. Section (a)(2) concerns health or safety needs that are not “reasonably satisfied.” Section (a)(3) concerns regulatory requirements that are not “reasonably satisfied.” But the *price* … Continue reading
More bad Bayh-Dole advice in the wild
Here are “three important questions answered” by a company specializing in Bayh-Dole compliance. (I’m sorry, Nikki. Have your people up their game.) 1) If you report an invention after the 60-day deadline, can the Government take title? Yes, the Government … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet
Tagged Bayh-Dole, compliance, disclosure, subject invention
Comments Off on More bad Bayh-Dole advice in the wild
Typical Bayh-Dole wrongness in the wild
Here’s a 2017 article on Bayh-Dole, “Bullies and Beakers: How Large Universities are Squashing Research Competition and the Contractual Remedies to Solve It,” by Jonathan Fort, then a law student, published in the Washington University Journal of Law & Policy. … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, incentive, Yale v Fenn
Comments Off on Typical Bayh-Dole wrongness in the wild
9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 3
We have worked through nine things Bayh-Dole does not require. Let’s come back around and work through in detail the disclosure requirement that Bayh-Dole does not require. Bayh-Dole has a disclosure requirement that is to be placed in the default … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged (f)(2), Bayh-Dole, written agreement
Comments Off on 9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 3
9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 2
We are working through a list of nine things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do. It’s worth the review because there are all sorts of claims out there–almost never contested–about what Bayh-Dole requires. Most of it is nonsense. And … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, requirements, technology transfer
Comments Off on 9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 2
9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 1
Let’s review some of the things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do. These, despite what you may have heard. First the list, then the discussion, then an extended technical note for the folks that want detail and think perhaps … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, commercialization, disclosure, invention, ownership, subject invention
Comments Off on 9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 1
Bayh-Dole’s patent law policy on patent property rights, 2
We are working through Bayh-Dole’s statement of policy at 35 USC 200 on the premise that this statement of policy, a part of patent law, has a material effect on the patent property rights of all inventions within the scope … Continue reading