Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Author Archives: Gerald Barnett
An Effect of Petty University Patent Monopolies
We have discussed the idea that university ownership of patents ought to be different from just any ownership of patents. Universities ought not use patents to exclude all use, for instance, or to license or assign to someone who will … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on An Effect of Petty University Patent Monopolies
Royalty sharing as federally mandated divisiveness
Here’s a sliver of divisiveness in Bayh-Dole (35 USC 202(c)(7)). In the case of a nonprofit organization, …. (B) a requirement that the contractor share royalties with the inventor On the face of it, this seems to be a happy requirement. … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, Cortez the Killer, royalty, Stanford v Roche
Comments Off on Royalty sharing as federally mandated divisiveness
Bayh-Dole, federal welfare for patent bureaucrats
There is a vast public literature–academic, legal, and popular–that claims Bayh-Dole is a wild success. That literature claims that compliance with Bayh-Dole requires commercialization, and that it is by commercialization that public benefit from federal research comes about. That argument reduces … Continue reading
On Crossing the Commons
I was in a conversation with some folks associated with the University of Alaska and wrote the following bit about my past work. With a bit of editing for a different context, and the usual expansion to flesh things out … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Open Source, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on On Crossing the Commons
Poppy fields forever
The great challenge with a received view is to see the world afresh, without the habitual cognitive anchors–to move free of the anchors–the assumptions, the chosen dichotomies, the methods of classifying, the rationales, the take on historical context–to work out what we should … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Freedom, Social Science
Comments Off on Poppy fields forever
What we have lost
Before their efforts turned to Bayh-Dole, the folks advocating invention mining at universities aimed to make the IPA a standard across all government agencies. Yes, “uniform” policy was what they argued for, but that was the politics. What they wanted … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Policy
Comments Off on What we have lost
Nanopore subject invention patent battles
Illumina is suing Oxford Nanopore over nanopore technology for DNA sequencing. Here’s what is interesting. Illumina licensed patents from the University of Washington and University of Alabama (joint owners). The underlying inventions were made with federal support. Oxford Nanopore licensed … Continue reading
3 Ways to Get at Bayh-Dole Abuses
Here are three approaches to get at abuse of Bayh-Dole by patent brokers. 1. Invoke the non-use march-in condition. 35 USC 203(a)(1) Demand federal march-in for nonuse (35 USC 203(a)(1)) for all subject inventions claimed by universities that do not meet … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Comments Off on 3 Ways to Get at Bayh-Dole Abuses
Don’t think it will be easy to get at Bayh-Dole
Bayh-Dole was designed to create private patent monopolies for the pharmaceutical industry that operate without public oversight or accountability. Almost everything about Bayh-Dole is a corruption of prior federal and university practice. Sure, it is possible that university administrators might stand up and … Continue reading
To fix Bayh-Dole on reasonable pricing, why not start by enforcing the law?
I spent some time working through whether Bayh-Dole requires reasonable pricing. The simple answer is “No.” Of course, the simple answer isn’t very helpful, or accurate. Bayh-Dole does not require reasonable pricing by design of those drafting the bill. The … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, competition, IPA, march-in, policy, price, reasonable
Comments Off on To fix Bayh-Dole on reasonable pricing, why not start by enforcing the law?