Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Technology Transfer
Best practices in university invention management, 2
We are working through an article in the ipHandbook that argues for “best practices” in university ownership of inventions. The article spends little time discussing how faculty are employed in their research work, nor the other requirements of university policy … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged invention, ipHandbook, ownership, policy
Comments Off on Best practices in university invention management, 2
Best practices in university invention management, 1
Things get complicated that don’t have to be complicated when it comes to university ownership of inventions. Administrators make things complicated, then argue for lots of money to pay for the talent to navigate those complications, and then more money … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Bozonet, Freedom, Policy, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer
Tagged invention, ipHandbook, ownership, policy
Comments Off on Best practices in university invention management, 1
Unleashing American Innovation
NIST convened a symposium in April 2018 titled “Unleashing American Innovation”: On April 19, 2018, thought leaders from across government, industry and academia gathered in Washington, D.C., to discuss how we can work together to address systemic barriers to catalyze the … Continue reading
Posted in Technology Transfer
Tagged carbon nanotubes, NIST
Comments Off on Unleashing American Innovation
The Basic Policy Question Behind Bayh-Dole
There’s one simple issue: Should the federal government subsidize with public funding for nonprofit research the creation of patent monopolies? There it is. The answer that has dominated for thirty-five years is “Yes.” How comfortable are you with that? Gut-level? … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Policy, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Tagged Bayh-Dole, federal funding, IPA, patent policy, research, scheme
Comments Off on The Basic Policy Question Behind Bayh-Dole
Institutional patent derangement syndrome
The discussion of university ownership of patents on inventions made in faculty-led research invariably adopts the singular. Consider one invention at one university. Now, doesn’t it make sense that university administrators should take over that invention for the good of … Continue reading
Posted in Bozonet, Policy, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Tagged institutional patent derangement syndrome, inventions, madness, nanotubes, patents
Comments Off on Institutional patent derangement syndrome
Some reading for technology transfer professionals
Every so often I have asked people what articles ought to be required reading for people in university technology transfer. One great suggestion is David Teece’s “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.” Another has … Continue reading
Posted in Technology Transfer
Tagged reading list, technology transfer
Comments Off on Some reading for technology transfer professionals
The bozonet on mount stupid
I mentioned “mount stupid” last week in a three-part article on the University of Utah. Mount stupid is a bit of a meme derived from accounts of the Dunning-Kruger effect, which I have referred to in developing an account of … Continue reading
Posted in Bozonet, Technology Transfer
Tagged bozonet, dunning-kruger effect, mount stupid, technology transfer
Comments Off on The bozonet on mount stupid
Whistling all the way to the bank, revisited 3
Having established the contracting problem for government-sponsored “basic research,” let’s get into how the patent administration folks got into changing things around from government ownership (with its open access, often without conditions or formalities) to institutional ownership (or, more accurately, … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Tagged Bayh-Dole, inventions, IPA, patents
Comments Off on Whistling all the way to the bank, revisited 3
Available to one, developed by none, 1
A repeated argument regarding inventions made with federal support was that the public would benefit from these inventions only if companies invested substantial amounts of private capital in developing the inventions as commercial products. Without commercial development at private expense, … Continue reading
Posted in History, IP, Policy, Projects, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Available to one, developed by none, 1
More Contempt of the Supreme Court at the NIH
Here is more misrepresentation of Bayh-Dole from the NIH, the creator of Bayh-Dole, purporting to be advice for inventors: Under the Bayh-Dole Act, your institution as the grant recipient owns rights to the NIH-funded invention and has the right and obligation … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on More Contempt of the Supreme Court at the NIH