Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Author Archives: Gerald Barnett
The Dole-Bayh Act: Preference for United States Industry
Before there was the Bayh-Dole Act, Senator Dole drafted a version of the law. We are looking at various sections. Today, the Preference for United States Industry. In Bayh-Dole, this is 35 USC 204. But in Dole-Bayh, it is Section … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, manufactured substantially, preference, United States industry
Comments Off on The Dole-Bayh Act: Preference for United States Industry
Defense Contracting, Bayh-Dole Fantasies, and Workarounds–3
We have been working through a DoD guide for contracting officers in navigating IP rights–Bayh-Dole and data rights. The data rights are a whole nother saga, so we are leaving them alone for now. Here in summary form are the … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, manufactured substantially, march-in, trade secret
Comments Off on Defense Contracting, Bayh-Dole Fantasies, and Workarounds–3
Defense Contracting, Bayh-Dole Fantasies, and Workarounds–2
We are working through a guide for Department of Defense contract officers that has been left up at a government website for nearly twenty years. Much has changed, but the guide hasn’t. From it we can gain some insights into … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, contracting
Comments Off on Defense Contracting, Bayh-Dole Fantasies, and Workarounds–2
Defense Contracting, Bayh-Dole Fantasies, and Workarounds–1
In 2001, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense For Acquisition, Technology and Logistics published a guide to federal contracting–“Intellectual Property: Navigating Through Commercial Waters: Issues and Solutions When Negotiating Intellectual Property with Commercial Companies.” [Or get it here. … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, federal contract
Comments Off on Defense Contracting, Bayh-Dole Fantasies, and Workarounds–1
The Dole-Bayh Act: Subject Inventor
Before the Bayh-Dole bill came together, there were precursors. One of these is a draft bill produced by Senator Dole. It differs in a number of ways from the bill that became Bayh-Dole, and the differences provide some insight into … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, subject inventor
Comments Off on The Dole-Bayh Act: Subject Inventor
The Dole-Bayh Act: Patentability
We are looking at a draft of a bill proposed by Senator Dole, with Bayh along for the ride. It–and other drafts, such as the Thornton bill (HR 8596), and the Institutional Patent Agreement master, and the Federal Procurement Regulation … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, invention, patentability
Comments Off on The Dole-Bayh Act: Patentability
Persons under Bayh-Dole
Bayh-Dole defines “contractor” as ” Any person, small business firm, or nonprofit organization that is a party to a funding agreement. You might think this is about as straightforward as things can get. You might think wrong. What follows is … Continue reading
Bayh-Dole, Tyrannosaurus
Bayh-Dole is a mess of a law. There’s the mess of the conception itself, the disgusting and ineffectual idea that the federal government should sue its citizens for using inventions made with public funding to advance public purposes–and should do … Continue reading
Mick Stadler writes a letter in 1976 on “effective transfer mechanisms”–2
We are working through Mick Stadler’s 1976 letter to Research Corporation’s Willard Marcy. Stadler outlines eight functions for a next generation “technology transfer mechanism.” The essentials of Stadler’s view are that the mechanism must distribute technology widely, must be distributed, … Continue reading
Mick Stadler writes a letter in 1976 on “effective transfer mechanisms”–1
On June 29, 1976 Mick Stadler wrote a letter to Willard Marcy, the Vice President of Research Corporation’s Patent Program. Stadler at the time was assistant director of the Case Western Reserve technology transfer program. He would go on to … Continue reading
Posted in History, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged industry, Stadler, technology transfer
1 Comment