Tag Archives: USC

USC still misrepresents Bayh-Dole, 2018 version-Fitt 3

Now, for comedy. USC turns from the obligations of the Bayh-Dole act for universities to technology transfer: Benefits of disclosure and technology transfer include: Bayh-Dole does not require technology transfer. A contractor may comply with Bayh-Dole by using its subject … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on USC still misrepresents Bayh-Dole, 2018 version-Fitt 3

USC still misrepresents Bayh-Dole, 2018 version-Fitt 2

[Update 2/10/2021–still misrepresents, still wrong.] USC’s “Bayh-Dole Act Obligations for Universities” overdramatizes–no, misrepresents–Bayh-Dole. USC turns to its own policies. Even here, things are not quite what they seem. Under the USC Intellectual Property Policy, with some exceptions called out within … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on USC still misrepresents Bayh-Dole, 2018 version-Fitt 2

USC still misrepresents Bayh-Dole, 2018 version-Fitt 1

USC has a document on the web titled “Bayh-Dole Act Obligations for Universities” dated Sept 26, 2018 by the “USC Office of Research.” Let’s have a look. This memorandum provides an overview of University and Federal policies and procedures concerning … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on USC still misrepresents Bayh-Dole, 2018 version-Fitt 1