Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Tag Archives: Bayh-Dole
The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 7
We have come full circle through NIH’s garbled version of Bayh-Dole, having been referred by the NIH’s SBIR guidance back to the NIH’s policy manual regarblization of Bayh-Dole in section 8.2.4. Section 8.2 has a bunch of data and research … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, NIH, subject invention
Comments Off on The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 7
The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 6
Research Enterprise has been examining the NIH’s representation of Bayh-Dole. So far we have seen that the NIH persists in citing a 1995 document that gives “guidance” that the Supreme Court in Stanford v Roche (2011) rejected. But the NIH … Continue reading
The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 5
We are working NIH’s not so tasty guidance to participants in its SBIR and STTR programs directed at small businesses. We reach the NIH’s account of the “principal features” of Bayh-Dole, at least with regard to “intellectual property” requirements: Principal … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged (f)(2), Bayh-Dole, clueless, NIH, subject invention, written agreement
Comments Off on The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 5
The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 4
Here’s the NIH offering an overview of Bayh-Dole for its SBIR and STTR programs. Much of the “information” here appears to be drawn from an NIH Q&A document from 1995. That document, “A ’20-20′ View of Invention Reporting to the … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, clueless, NIH, Stanford v Roche
Comments Off on The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 4
The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 3
We are working through NIH guidance on Bayh-Dole reporting requirements. In the process we are making note about how thoroughly NIH misrepresents Bayh-Dole. Sloppy? Indifferent? Does it matter? The next bit is going to be a bother: If it helps, … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged 37 CFR 401.9, Bayh-Dole, NIH
Comments Off on The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 3
The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 2
A while ago, I worked through a slide in an NIH presentation about Bayh-Dole compliance. The conclusion there was that the presentation was sloppy, lacked important details, and misrepresented the Bayh-Dole standard patent rights clause. There are other accounts of … Continue reading
Bayh-Dole Up Your Counsel, 4
We are working through the UpCounsel account of Bayh-Dole. It’s not all terrible. There are some useful points to come. Overall, however, the work here is sloppy, misleading, not what one would expect for a barrel full of part-time legal … Continue reading
Bayh-Dole Up Your Counsel, 3
I won’t belabor the problems in the next section of UpCounsel’s account of Bayh-Dole. The major provisions of Bayh-Dole are 1) a public covenant that runs with patent property rights on inventions arising in federally supported research or development–and specifically … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, march-in, small business
Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Up Your Counsel, 3
Bayh-Dole Up Your Counsel, 2
This is UpCounsel’s 11 minute Q & A on the Bayh-Dole Act. We are working through it, Mystery Science Fiction Theatre 3000 style. Are you Joel? Am I Tom Servo? And who is the mad Dr. Forrester who keeps making … Continue reading
Has NIST finally created a foobar standard patent rights clause?
Words in laws ought to mean something. According to Bayh-Dole’s standard patent rights clause, the initial contractor must require its employees to make a written agreement to establish the government’s rights in subject inventions. But, but, but . . . … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Stanford v Roche
Tagged assignment, Bayh-Dole, new rule, NIST
Comments Off on Has NIST finally created a foobar standard patent rights clause?