Tag Archives: Bayh-Dole

Reagan’s Executive Order 12591-2

Posted on February 12, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

So far we have discussed President Reagan’s Executive Order 12591 mandating the promotion of commercialization (something not in Bayh-Dole) by having federal agencies grant title to patents (something else not in Bayh-Dole) to all contractors–not just to large companies that … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Reagan’s Executive Order 12591-2

Reagan’s Executive Order 12591-1

Posted on February 11, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

[Some slight elaborations here and there. 1/6/2020. Latker claims he wrote this EO. Makes sense, given the crappy (or clever–but still sloppy) drafting.] In 1987, President Reagan issued Executive Order 12591, which extended, sort of, the Bayh-Dole Act to all … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Reagan’s Executive Order 12591-1

Federal law on inventions made with federal support, 4

Posted on February 6, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

One cannot read “contractor” in Bayh-Dole and assume that “contractor” only refers to the initial or prime contractor. One must always look to the circumstances of a given contract to determine whether others have been made parties to the funding … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Federal law on inventions made with federal support, 4

Federal law on inventions made with federal support, 3

Posted on February 5, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

Now, let’s emphasize a few points. There are at least three ways that a contractor may come to own an invention made with federal support: inventors assign their inventions state law (in some cases, such as Ohio Rev Code 3345.14) … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Federal law on inventions made with federal support, 3

Federal law on inventions made with federal support, 2

Posted on February 4, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

Next, we add citations and qualifications to ground this framework. Specialty statutes for specific federal purposes control federal claims of ownership of inventions made under federal contract. See the list of such statutes at 35 USC 210. If a specialty statute … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Federal law on inventions made with federal support, 2

Federal law on inventions made with federal support

Posted on February 4, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

First, the brief version: Specialty statutes for specific federal purposes control federal claims of ownership of inventions made under federal contract. The Nixon patent policy as amended by Reagan’s executive order otherwise controls federal claims of ownership of inventions made under … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Federal law on inventions made with federal support

Bush v Kilgore v the Old Order v Now

Posted on February 1, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

In 2005, Nicholas Steneck at the University of Michigan taught a course in the history of science–“Science, Technology and Society–1940 to the Present.” Here’s his lecture outline for the part about federally funded science and engineering during World War 2: … Continue reading →

Posted in Policy, Sponsored Research, Vannever Bush | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Bush v Kilgore v the Old Order v Now

Inventor freedom and the unexpected model of innovation, 1

Posted on January 28, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

Consider an alternative to the present university administrator mania for patenting. Let’s start with inventor freedom and then look once more at what I call Vannevar Bush’s unexpected model of innovation. There are difficulties in the effort. First, the social … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Innovation, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Inventor freedom and the unexpected model of innovation, 1

Another NIST FAQ-up, 2

Posted on January 24, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

For the rest of NIST’s FAQ’d-up answer, let’s parse closely. NIST has just repeated the obvious–if an invention has been conceived and reduced to practice prior to federal funding, it is not a subject invention. The question, however, has to … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Another NIST FAQ-up, 2

Another NIST FAQ-up, 1

Posted on January 23, 2019 by Gerald Barnett

NIST doesn’t understand Bayh-Dole. Let’s take another look at their mind-numbing FAQ. Here’s the question NIST asks: Does an invention need to be reported if it was conceived before an award but reduced to practice as part of the award? This … Continue reading →

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Another NIST FAQ-up, 1