Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Technology Transfer
On Crossing the Commons
I was in a conversation with some folks associated with the University of Alaska and wrote the following bit about my past work. With a bit of editing for a different context, and the usual expansion to flesh things out … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Open Source, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on On Crossing the Commons
Research Monopolies and Development Monopolies
Here is one thing that I don’t understand about the standard distinction between research and development and how all this fits into ideas about commercialization. Let’s say that research produces a result that is immediately useful. Isn’t the research then development? … Continue reading
Posted in Innovation, Technology Transfer
Tagged development, research monopoly
Comments Off on Research Monopolies and Development Monopolies
The Public Research Patent Covenant–Narrative Version
The Institutional Patent Agreement approach to patent rights arising from federally supported research carried with it what we may call a public covenant, a set of conditions that run with each patent on a subject invention that place limits on … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Commons, Policy, Social Science, Technology Transfer, Vannever Bush
Tagged Bayh-Dole, Bremer, IPA, middlemen, public covenant
Comments Off on The Public Research Patent Covenant–Narrative Version
Covenants, Public Good, and Money
I’ve covered a great deal of ground in the last few articles. I’ll summarize and vent here. Universities impose conditions on the use of the patents they acquire, and these conditions form covenants that run with the patents for the … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Covenants, Public Good, and Money
What universities can and can’t do with their patents
We started an investigation into university IP practice with this question: Should university management of patents be any different from any other owner of patents? The answer we found is “yes.” University patents not only should be different–they clearly are … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Litigation, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged flip, invention, make-use commons, patent, practice, share, troll
Comments Off on What universities can and can’t do with their patents
University Patent Practice: Share
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Share
University Patent Practice: Practice
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Practice
University Patent Practice: Flip
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Flip
University Patent Practice: Troll
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Troll
Regulatory limitations on fun-lovin’ university patent administrators
My argument is that university patents aren’t like other patents–not like corporate patents, not like entrepreneur patents, not like speculator patents. My argument also is that universities are limited in how they manage patents, and therefore they are not in … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Regulatory limitations on fun-lovin’ university patent administrators