Category Archives: Policy

Graphene, or 7300 patents waiting for commercialization

The BBC is running a cluster of stories today on graphene, a material consisting of a single layer of carbon atoms. The UK angle is that graphene was invented in Britain, but Chinese and American organizations have flooded the area … Continue reading

Posted in Commons, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Graphene, or 7300 patents waiting for commercialization

Building Pillar One: Freedom To Innovate

Of the seven pillars of university new innovation practice, freedom to innovate is the most important. University policies on research and invention were at one time liberal. That is, faculty and students had the freedom to publish, experiment, discuss, collaborate, … Continue reading

Posted in Freedom, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Building Pillar One: Freedom To Innovate

The Seven Pillars of New University Innovation Practice

Here are the Seven Pillars of the New University Innovation Practice.  Freedom to innovate is not new–it is the form of practice that university faculty developed over the course of 75 years, and was the source of “successes” that were … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on The Seven Pillars of New University Innovation Practice

The Paradise of University Rhetoric About Science and Innovation

Ian Sample, writing for The Guardian’s ShortcutsBlog, describes how MIT grad students in 2005 created a “fake science report” generator that produced bogus scientific articles for presentation at conferences. Now anyone can download the generator: But this is the hoax … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Paradise of University Rhetoric About Science and Innovation

More Bayh-Dole Nonsense

In the “Innovation U 2.0” report, we find the now expectable misrepresentation of the Bayh-Dole Act: Following the passage of the Bayh-Dole legislation in 1980 every US university had the responsibility–and new opportunities–to work with faculty innovators in assessing the … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on More Bayh-Dole Nonsense

Ouroboros Innovation Advocacy

SSTI just sent out a note about a new report by Louis G. Tornatzky and Elaine C. Redeout, “Innovation U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy.” After a brief read through it, I’m left puzzled. Perhaps this note … Continue reading

Posted in Innovation, Metrics, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Ouroboros Innovation Advocacy

Be Advocates for the Doers

Universities prior to Bayh-Dole generally pushed invention management to external agents. These agents took on the expense, the complexity, the competitive issues, and the liability. These agents allowed universities to avoid direct conflicts of interest between managing the research environment … Continue reading

Posted in Freedom, History, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Be Advocates for the Doers

The secret student "investment" in technology transfer

About a month ago, I wrote a couple of essays on the Brookings report “University Start-ups: Critical for Improving Technology Transfer.” The Brookings report thinks that university administrators starting and investing in companies is a really keen idea, especially if … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on The secret student "investment" in technology transfer

Another Thing That Can Go Wrong With HR 3309

Are you tracking the anti-troll legislation making its way through Congress? Chris Gallagher has been doing that, and some of you are no doubt on his mailing list with updates. If you are an administrator at a university, and you … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Litigation, Policy | Comments Off on Another Thing That Can Go Wrong With HR 3309

Ten Reasons Why Deans and Provosts Should Support Freedom to Innovate

Freedom to innovate policies limit the manner in which universities and other non-profit organizations claim ownership of intellectual property developed in the research and instructional programs they host. These limitations, far from being adverse to institutional interests, promote a creative, … Continue reading

Posted in Freedom, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Ten Reasons Why Deans and Provosts Should Support Freedom to Innovate