Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Policy
Graphene, or 7300 patents waiting for commercialization
The BBC is running a cluster of stories today on graphene, a material consisting of a single layer of carbon atoms. The UK angle is that graphene was invented in Britain, but Chinese and American organizations have flooded the area … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Graphene, or 7300 patents waiting for commercialization
Building Pillar One: Freedom To Innovate
Of the seven pillars of university new innovation practice, freedom to innovate is the most important. University policies on research and invention were at one time liberal. That is, faculty and students had the freedom to publish, experiment, discuss, collaborate, … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Building Pillar One: Freedom To Innovate
The Seven Pillars of New University Innovation Practice
Here are the Seven Pillars of the New University Innovation Practice. Freedom to innovate is not new–it is the form of practice that university faculty developed over the course of 75 years, and was the source of “successes” that were … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The Seven Pillars of New University Innovation Practice
The Paradise of University Rhetoric About Science and Innovation
Ian Sample, writing for The Guardian’s ShortcutsBlog, describes how MIT grad students in 2005 created a “fake science report” generator that produced bogus scientific articles for presentation at conferences. Now anyone can download the generator: But this is the hoax … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Science, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged bad science, fake science, outcomes, paddy west, uncaring money
Comments Off on The Paradise of University Rhetoric About Science and Innovation
More Bayh-Dole Nonsense
In the “Innovation U 2.0” report, we find the now expectable misrepresentation of the Bayh-Dole Act: Following the passage of the Bayh-Dole legislation in 1980 every US university had the responsibility–and new opportunities–to work with faculty innovators in assessing the … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on More Bayh-Dole Nonsense
Ouroboros Innovation Advocacy
SSTI just sent out a note about a new report by Louis G. Tornatzky and Elaine C. Redeout, “Innovation U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy.” After a brief read through it, I’m left puzzled. Perhaps this note … Continue reading
Posted in Innovation, Metrics, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Ouroboros Innovation Advocacy
Be Advocates for the Doers
Universities prior to Bayh-Dole generally pushed invention management to external agents. These agents took on the expense, the complexity, the competitive issues, and the liability. These agents allowed universities to avoid direct conflicts of interest between managing the research environment … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, History, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Be Advocates for the Doers
The secret student "investment" in technology transfer
About a month ago, I wrote a couple of essays on the Brookings report “University Start-ups: Critical for Improving Technology Transfer.” The Brookings report thinks that university administrators starting and investing in companies is a really keen idea, especially if … Continue reading
Posted in Metrics, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The secret student "investment" in technology transfer
Another Thing That Can Go Wrong With HR 3309
Are you tracking the anti-troll legislation making its way through Congress? Chris Gallagher has been doing that, and some of you are no doubt on his mailing list with updates. If you are an administrator at a university, and you … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Litigation, Policy
Comments Off on Another Thing That Can Go Wrong With HR 3309
Ten Reasons Why Deans and Provosts Should Support Freedom to Innovate
Freedom to innovate policies limit the manner in which universities and other non-profit organizations claim ownership of intellectual property developed in the research and instructional programs they host. These limitations, far from being adverse to institutional interests, promote a creative, … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Ten Reasons Why Deans and Provosts Should Support Freedom to Innovate