Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Bayh-Dole
I want my, I want my IPA–Part I
From time to time advocates of the idea that Bayh-Dole vests ownership of inventions with employers argue that the intent of the law was to build off of the Institutional Patent Agreement model developed by the NIH. The IPA approach … Continue reading
A Provisional History
I have been trying to figure out what happened to Research Corporation and why AUTM is so antagonistic to the idea of faculty inventors having a choice of who they work with to deploy their research findings. I call it … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on A Provisional History
Patent litigation: the new public purpose of the American research university
While working on a new Guide to Bayh-Dole (one that COGR has yet to thank me for), I spent some time looking at recent patent infringement litigation initiated by universities. It’s not a pretty picture. In “Sue U.,” Jacob H. … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Patent litigation: the new public purpose of the American research university
10 Issues That May Limit Infringement Claims on Subject Inventions
I have been working on the problem of infringement litigation involving subject inventions under Bayh-Dole. Here is a working summary of Bayh-Dole-related issues that companies being hit by universities with subject invention infringement cases might consider. I am not aware … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, IP
Tagged Bayh-Dole, future user rights, infringement
Comments Off on 10 Issues That May Limit Infringement Claims on Subject Inventions
Letters of Marque
Here is an odd thing. Under the US Constitution, Congress is granted in Article I, Section 8, among other Powers, the power To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged Bayh-Dole, letter of marque, Stanford v Roche, talk like a pirate day
Comments Off on Letters of Marque
The Compliance Apparatus is Essential to Bayh-Dole
The Bayh-Dole Act is often presented as a boon to universities. Yet a reading of the law as it makes its way into federal funding agreements suggests otherwise. Universities are a problem, and a lot of apparatus of Bayh-Dole is … Continue reading
An Updated Guide to the Bayh-Dole Act
Ah, COGR has not contacted me yet for help in revising their long-neglected Guide to the Bayh-Dole Act. While I waited for their call, I put together this text for a brochure that might serve until they have finished revising, … Continue reading
Problems with COGR’s 1999 "Guide" to Bayh-Dole
In 1999, the Council on Governmental Relations, a non-profit organization that fronts for over 100 research universities on lobbying and advocacy issues, produced an influential summary of the Bayh-Dole Act, “The Bayh-Dole Act: A Guide to the Law and Implementing … Continue reading
Compulsion, Fifth Amendment Taking, and SPRC (f)(2)
Given the apparent intention of certain advocates for Bayh-Dole that the purpose of the law should be that universities come to own faculty inventions made with federal support, thereby effectively cutting off Research Corporation and other independent invention management agents … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Present Assignment, Stanford v Roche
Comments Off on Compulsion, Fifth Amendment Taking, and SPRC (f)(2)
Three Responses to the SPRC post-Stanford v Roche
In the Bayh-Dole Act, a “subject invention” is defined as any invention of the contractor conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the performance of work under a funding agreement… (35 USC 201(e)). A “contractor” is defined as any … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Stanford v Roche
Comments Off on Three Responses to the SPRC post-Stanford v Roche