Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Technology Transfer
Pathway Dependence
Let’s look at a licensing situation set up two different ways. The purpose is to illustrate pathway dependence of an offer. Let’s say we have an invention with an associated patent right and a university laboratory willing to engage industry … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Projects, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Pathway Dependence
Whose Research is It?
Really, it is *their* research, but not in the normal ownership way of thinking. I’m talking about university principal investigators. In the university way of doing things, faculty are not required to conduct research as a part of their employment … Continue reading
Posted in Projects, Social Science, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Whose Research is It?
The Third Flavor
What’s not perhaps so obvious is how much variation and structure there is in the third flavor of technology transfer, from lab to application. We have four venues for this work: independent inventors, industry labs, government labs, and university labs. … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The Third Flavor
Cooperative Competition
The Tour de France finished up at the end of July. The strategies of bicycle racing help to illustrate the practical nature of competition. In bicycle racing, there’s a mechanical advantage in being behind another racer. Trailing racers move into … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, IP, Metrics, Social Science, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Cooperative Competition
The Patent License that Keeps on Taking
I was presenting at a conference of independent research organizations. Many of these are non-profits with mission purposes to cure diseases and support social change through research. The question came up from the patent attorneys in the audience: how do … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The Patent License that Keeps on Taking
The PARC Dilemma
At Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center, a lot of great technology has been created. Postscript, ethernet, graphical user interfaces, the mouse, among others. The problem has been, that these technologies were not able to make it into the host company’s … Continue reading
Posted in Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The PARC Dilemma
3 Flavors of Tech Transfer
Technology transfer historically comes in three flavors. (1) From developed countries to developing countries–which these days means from India and China to California and Michigan. This work involves adapting technology, providing infrastructure, and training people to use the technology. For … Continue reading
Posted in Technology Transfer
Comments Off on 3 Flavors of Tech Transfer
The Folks that Matter
Who matters in university invention management? I suggest these are: 1) the investigators–it is *their* research in university settings; 2) the inventors–they invent within the context of the investigators’ research–they should have standing within this context; 3) the community–these folk, … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The Folks that Matter
I read the brief today, oh boy
I worked through the MIT amicus brief in Stanford v. Roche. Better than AUTM and WARF. In brief, it wastes time on stuff that doesn’t relate, such as how important government research is to MIT. Instead it should focus on … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, IP, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on I read the brief today, oh boy
Optimal Boeufmerde: AUTM’s model of tech transfer can’t get any better
The Kauffman Foundation (reminder: co-funds RTEI but has nothing to do with this blog or my opinions) suggested in a recent proposal that university licensing practice was “sub-optimal.” This has gotten the rile up in the lost territorial alley dog … Continue reading