Category Archives: Technology Transfer

In Defense of Inventor Liberty

University patent administrators are proposing a distorted reading of federal regulations in an effort to ensure that you never own your own inventions, even when you make them on your own time, outside of the use of university facilities.  They think it makes … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Social Science, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on In Defense of Inventor Liberty

Thanksgiving

With this holiday in America being a time for giving thanks after the harvest and for the establishment of a constitutional government devoted to safety and happiness, making it a truly economic celebration built on a recognition of the good … Continue reading

Posted in History, Social Science, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Thanksgiving

The Bitter Irony of Vesting

As you might have noticed if you have followed the development of my discussions on this blog, I have spent much time working through Bayh-Dole, often in association with the Stanford v. Roche case.  As I’ve pointed out, I am … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on The Bitter Irony of Vesting

For every scenario, other scenarios

AUTM imagines faculty researchers messing around with patent obligations and creating a situation where no one has undivided ownership of a research invention.  To AUTM, this is horrifying.  How can one make money  exclusively licensing to monopolists to make a … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, IP, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on For every scenario, other scenarios

A Patent License in the DFARS

With all the talk about template patent licenses these days, I thought it might be worth pointing out that in the DFARS there is a template patent license that the Government expects when obtaining patent rights.  You can find it … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on A Patent License in the DFARS

Minimum Policy, Phase 2

[This is a pre-Stanford v Roche discussion. I have updated it for current CFR references. A contractor does not “elect title”–a contractor may “elect to retain title” that the contractor has obtained by conventional means. A contractor’s option under a … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Minimum Policy, Phase 2

Your transfer to the unknown has come through

You know, the money sweet spot for invention commercialization is to take acute conditions and make them chronic.   That’s like a drug to treat the pain rather than an intervention that cures the condition causing the pain, or providing protection … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Your transfer to the unknown has come through

We have questions

When we interpret Bayh-Dole as a social text, we get beyond the immediate claims and into a territory that tests our competence. Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, IP, Literature, Social Science, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on We have questions

What Remains to Be Seen

I want to return to a paragraph from a previous post and go another direction with it: While the standard patents rights clause is indeed standard, the only two things about it that are standard are that it applies in … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on What Remains to Be Seen

Artifact, Invention, Technology, Change

University research technology often takes the form of artifacts.  Often the academic discussion is about the merit of research objectives in terms of demonstrating, proving out, or advancing a concept or theory or argument.  The “technology” that results is treated … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Projects, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Artifact, Invention, Technology, Change