Category Archives: Technology Transfer

Present Assignment ADD at UC

The University of California has present assignment language in its “Patent Acknowledgment“: I acknowledge my obligation to assign, and do hereby assign, inventions and patents that I conceive or develop within the course and scope of my University employment while … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Policy, Technology Transfer | 1 Comment

Drafting the Unknown

As I’m reading through university IP policies, I’ve begun to notice how those drafting the policies are grappling with the unknown. There are a number of unknowns–many policies don’t evidence that the drafters know IP, and others work hard to … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bozonet, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Drafting the Unknown

Fixin' for Some Bayh-Dole Fixing

Here’s more in the wild on vesting interpretations of Stanford v. Roche.  Written by a suit of attorneys at the firm of Bracewell & Guiliani, it gets a piece of the Supreme Court decision right, does a decent job summarizing … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Social Science, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Fixin' for Some Bayh-Dole Fixing

The Party Boat

Here’s a bit from the Rice University Invention and Patent Policy: In the case of Government-supported research, the Bayh-Dole Act and subsequent amendments and federal regulations provide the basis for current University technology transfer practices. Accordingly, while the University is … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged | Comments Off on The Party Boat

MIT's Patent Policy Problem

During the kerfluffle known as Stanford v Roche, one of the big advocates for Bayh-Dole as a vesting statute was MIT.   The MIT amicus brief is here.   It’s in this amicus brief that the idea that a present assignment trumping … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Policy, Sponsored Research, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on MIT's Patent Policy Problem

The "Patent Problem" in 1948

I’ve been looking at university patent policies lately and came across this discussion of university patent policies by Archie Palmer from 1948, produced by the National Research Counsel and available through Google Books. The discussion is notable for the clarity … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer | 2 Comments

The CHARM Act of 2012

We’ve had some long posts lately.  It’s been necessary.   And there will be more, to show just how thoroughly technology transfer programs have run amok, how there are viable and attractive alternatives, that there are folks ready to develop these … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on The CHARM Act of 2012

Institutional IP Baksheesh

Here is perhaps the worst conceived and written paragraph in University of Washington policy history.   Seven sentences without the hope of connecting their subject and verbs into a coherent expression.  Read, enjoy.  I’ll work through the finer points in a … Continue reading

Posted in Bozonet, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer | 2 Comments

Time to Reboot the Franchise

I have been working through University of Washington policy on inventions.   One of the interesting–and dismaying–aspects of the Washington policy is its use of conflict of interest policies to route intellectual property ownership to the control of administrators.   I know, … Continue reading

Posted in Policy, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Time to Reboot the Franchise

How the Disease Spread

A theme of this blog recently has been the transformation of faculty work from that of independent scholars working collectively to form a university to that of indentured labor working for management that controls the university.  This is particularly true … Continue reading

Posted in Technology Transfer | Comments Off on How the Disease Spread