Category Archives: Policy

A case for freedom

Let’s talk about “free agency”.   Institutions hate it, players love it.  Fans, they are not sure.  When it comes to university innovation, however, we need to work through a number of issues.  Let’s start with a few considerations. Universities have … Continue reading

Posted in Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on A case for freedom

The Most Wonderful Thing in the World

Here is a collection of clips from ten US research university IP policies.  The focus is on claims of ownership, not considering any of a number of other matters, such as royalty sharing schedules or the conditions on  which property … Continue reading

Posted in Policy, Present Assignment | 1 Comment

The Gulag of Inventions

A Chronicle of Higher Education story has this headline: “Ambitious AAUP Effort to Guide Relations Between Academics and Industry Meets Resistance.” The “resistance” is from two officials speaking for AUTM and AAU. These are the same folks who led the … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Metrics, Policy | Comments Off on The Gulag of Inventions

AUTM, the clueless inventor-loathing organization

. . . AUTM, of course, is already opposed, using their usual argument that everyone else is a stupid idiot and only AUTM has the intellectual capacity to navigate such “incredibly complex and nuanced matter.” {/vent} AUTM is the organization, … Continue reading

Posted in Bozonet, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , | Comments Off on AUTM, the clueless inventor-loathing organization

AAUP on University-Industry Relationships

The AAUP has released a working draft of a set of principles for university-industry relationships.  The text lays out a set of recommendations with regard to intellectual property, research contracting and strategic partnerships, and conflict of interest.  The AAUP is … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Policy, Sponsored Research | Comments Off on AAUP on University-Industry Relationships

Invention use or patent use, which will it be?

A while back I looked at the Lambert agreements.  These are model agreements developed in the UK that aim to normalize research arrangements between universities and companies.   My review of them argued that they were a bit sloppy and inconsistent, … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Commons, Policy, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Invention use or patent use, which will it be?

IP Governance or IP Management?

After Bayh-Dole was passed, university administrators got the idea that universities had to have policy statements to claim ownership of inventions to comply with Bayh-Dole.  The idea was that “elect to retain title” meant “elect title” which meant “title vests … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on IP Governance or IP Management?

Reef or Trench? University research and open access to results

There is a petition on-line asking the President to require the posting of “published results” of federally funded research on-line for public access.   A story about it is here.  The effort is led by John Wilbanks, who previously led Science … Continue reading

Posted in Commons, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Reef or Trench? University research and open access to results

Coolangatta IP

Traditional knowledge encompasses the information possessed and developed within a community.  Such knowledge arises and is used to inform the activities of the community–it is “traditional” in this way.  The authors of a AAAS handbook, in a discussion of TK, … Continue reading

Posted in Commons, History, Policy, Social Science, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Coolangatta IP

More Evidence in the Wild

Here is another example in the wild of the mischaracterization of Bayh-Dole.  This is a document that offers a “Brief Guide to Intellectual Property in a University Context”.   My point is to document how Bayh-Dole has been represented by university … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, IP, Policy, Stanford v Roche | Comments Off on More Evidence in the Wild