Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Policy
A case for freedom
Let’s talk about “free agency”. Institutions hate it, players love it. Fans, they are not sure. When it comes to university innovation, however, we need to work through a number of issues. Let’s start with a few considerations. Universities have … Continue reading
Posted in Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on A case for freedom
The Most Wonderful Thing in the World
Here is a collection of clips from ten US research university IP policies. The focus is on claims of ownership, not considering any of a number of other matters, such as royalty sharing schedules or the conditions on which property … Continue reading
Posted in Policy, Present Assignment
1 Comment
The Gulag of Inventions
A Chronicle of Higher Education story has this headline: “Ambitious AAUP Effort to Guide Relations Between Academics and Industry Meets Resistance.” The “resistance” is from two officials speaking for AUTM and AAU. These are the same folks who led the … Continue reading
AUTM, the clueless inventor-loathing organization
. . . AUTM, of course, is already opposed, using their usual argument that everyone else is a stupid idiot and only AUTM has the intellectual capacity to navigate such “incredibly complex and nuanced matter.” {/vent} AUTM is the organization, … Continue reading
Posted in Bozonet, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged AUTM, clueless, loathing
Comments Off on AUTM, the clueless inventor-loathing organization
AAUP on University-Industry Relationships
The AAUP has released a working draft of a set of principles for university-industry relationships. The text lays out a set of recommendations with regard to intellectual property, research contracting and strategic partnerships, and conflict of interest. The AAUP is … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Sponsored Research
Comments Off on AAUP on University-Industry Relationships
Invention use or patent use, which will it be?
A while back I looked at the Lambert agreements. These are model agreements developed in the UK that aim to normalize research arrangements between universities and companies. My review of them argued that they were a bit sloppy and inconsistent, … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Commons, Policy, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Invention use or patent use, which will it be?
IP Governance or IP Management?
After Bayh-Dole was passed, university administrators got the idea that universities had to have policy statements to claim ownership of inventions to comply with Bayh-Dole. The idea was that “elect to retain title” meant “elect title” which meant “title vests … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on IP Governance or IP Management?
Reef or Trench? University research and open access to results
There is a petition on-line asking the President to require the posting of “published results” of federally funded research on-line for public access. A story about it is here. The effort is led by John Wilbanks, who previously led Science … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Reef or Trench? University research and open access to results
Coolangatta IP
Traditional knowledge encompasses the information possessed and developed within a community. Such knowledge arises and is used to inform the activities of the community–it is “traditional” in this way. The authors of a AAAS handbook, in a discussion of TK, … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, History, Policy, Social Science, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Coolangatta IP
More Evidence in the Wild
Here is another example in the wild of the mischaracterization of Bayh-Dole. This is a document that offers a “Brief Guide to Intellectual Property in a University Context”. My point is to document how Bayh-Dole has been represented by university … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, IP, Policy, Stanford v Roche
Comments Off on More Evidence in the Wild