Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: IP
University patent policies as covert non-compete covenants
I have been looking at laws regarding non-compete covenants. A non-compete agreement aims to prevent a worker from accepting other work that would compete with his or her employer or business partner. In employment situations, this might include non-solicitation of … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Freedom, IP, Policy
1 Comment
Three Innovation Propositions of the Moloch-State
As American public universities ramp up their claims to own faculty inventions, software, works of authorship, and even know-how, all in the name of profit-seeking from “commercialization”–by which they mean something along the lines of “making money when speculative monopolists … Continue reading
Extending Affiliates Programs
“Affiliates programs” are generally donation-based financial support programs for university departments and schools. In exchange for a membership fee, an affiliate program participant gets various premiums–invitations to research reviews, open houses, and job fairs; access to university labs and faculty … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Commons, IP, Projects, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Extending Affiliates Programs
If Siri were free of rights, would there be a Siri?
Here is another article out today, from Peter Cohan, arguing that the US patent system should be scrapped. Are we are well past being able to reform it? Cohan’s five reasons don’t include regulatory capture, market inefficiencies, the march to … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Innovation, IP, Policy
Comments Off on If Siri were free of rights, would there be a Siri?
The Basic Premise of University Invention Management
Use = Success There’s really not much to add. Infringement is not an option.
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The Basic Premise of University Invention Management
On Deliberately Weak IP Rhetorics
I mentioned Boldrin and Levine’s argument against patents. Their paper (it is posted but labeled a draft) is very uneven, moving between dubious assertions and insightful analysis. Lurking over their discussion, though they do not acknowledge it, is Teece’s paper … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, IP, Policy, Social Science
Comments Off on On Deliberately Weak IP Rhetorics
Patent Abolition
John Gruber at Daring Fireball draws attention to an article in the The Atlantic by Jordan Weissmann who reports on a paper from the Federal Reserve by Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine arguing for the abolition of patents. The … Continue reading
AAUP on University-Industry Relationships
The AAUP has released a working draft of a set of principles for university-industry relationships. The text lays out a set of recommendations with regard to intellectual property, research contracting and strategic partnerships, and conflict of interest. The AAUP is … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Sponsored Research
Comments Off on AAUP on University-Industry Relationships
More Evidence in the Wild
Here is another example in the wild of the mischaracterization of Bayh-Dole. This is a document that offers a “Brief Guide to Intellectual Property in a University Context”. My point is to document how Bayh-Dole has been represented by university … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, IP, Policy, Stanford v Roche
Comments Off on More Evidence in the Wild
No-troll covenants
Twitter has announced an Innovator’s Patent Agreement (thanks for the link, Steve) that gives inventors some rights that run with any assignment of patents on their inventions. Inventors retain a right license with right to sublicense in the event that … Continue reading
Posted in History, IP, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on No-troll covenants