Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: IP
Exclusive licensing in Bayh-Dole, Part 1: Licenses and Assignments
Here is what Bayh-Dole says about exclusive licenses: Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no small business firm or nonprofit organization which receives title to any subject invention and no assignee of any such small business firm or nonprofit … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, IP
Tagged 35 USC 204, assignee, Bayh-Dole, do WTF law, exclusive license
2 Comments
Things universities can do with patents
A patent has many uses. A patent can be used to: exclude others from using an invention the patent owner is using prevent others from using an invention the patent owner is not using extract payments from users or companies wanting to market products … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, IP, Policy, Social Science
Comments Off on Things universities can do with patents
Choose Your Open Source License
There’s a useful guide at GitHub for choosing an open source license. The guide presents a developer with three distinct options: These capture three common, primary concerns that show up once one has made the decision to be open with … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Bozonet, Commons, IP, Open Source
Comments Off on Choose Your Open Source License
Covenants, Public Good, and Money
I’ve covered a great deal of ground in the last few articles. I’ll summarize and vent here. Universities impose conditions on the use of the patents they acquire, and these conditions form covenants that run with the patents for the … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Covenants, Public Good, and Money
What universities can and can’t do with their patents
We started an investigation into university IP practice with this question: Should university management of patents be any different from any other owner of patents? The answer we found is “yes.” University patents not only should be different–they clearly are … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Litigation, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged flip, invention, make-use commons, patent, practice, share, troll
Comments Off on What universities can and can’t do with their patents
University Patent Practice: Share
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Share
University Patent Practice: Practice
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Practice
University Patent Practice: Flip
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Flip
University Patent Practice: Troll
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University Patent Practice: Troll
University Patent Practice: Nonuse
Here are five ways to use a patent: Nonuse Don’t practice the claimed invention and exclude all others Troll Don’t practice, demand payment if others practice the claimed invention Flip Don’t practice, and exclusively … Continue reading