Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Bayh-Dole
The VA gets a bit of Bayh-Dole
The Department of Veteran’s Affairs produced a template Cooperative Technology (Inventions) Administration Agreement available at a web site called Agreement Sample. The template is modeled on a CRADA agreement, but instead of research, the agreement concerns the administration of inventions made … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged assignment, Bayh-Dole, veterans administration
Comments Off on The VA gets a bit of Bayh-Dole
Administrative lupus
I while ago I wrote an article on some suggestions for changing Bayh-Dole. The first suggestion was to add a research “exemption.” The authors–one a former senior university patent administrator from a very big university–were well meaning, and perhaps there … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Patents, Technology Transfer
Tagged Bayh-Dole, lupus, Madey v Duke, monopoly meme
Comments Off on Administrative lupus
These are not the investors Congress was looking for
Universities routinely assign federally funded inventions to companies. They do so under the cover of an exclusive patent license, expecting that they won’t get caught. There are two kinds of exclusive license. In one, a true exclusive license, the licensee … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet
Tagged assignment, Bayh-Dole, exclusive license, make, sell, substantial rights, use
Comments Off on These are not the investors Congress was looking for
Bayh-Dole inventor disclosure summary
Let’s summarize. Bayh-Dole does not require inventors to disclose inventions arising in federally supported research or development. It’s just not there. Go look. I’ll wait. Bayh-Dole does not require inventors to give up rights to their inventions. It’s not there. … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet
Tagged assignment, Bayh-Dole, dark lords, disclosure, patenting
Comments Off on Bayh-Dole inventor disclosure summary
When to disclose inventions? Part II: Bayh-Dole, 2
We are explaining why, despite widespread insistence by folks who set themselves up as experts, there’s no obligation in Bayh-Dole for inventors to disclose inventions made under a federal contract. The first point to be made is that if one … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet
Tagged Bayh-Dole, disclosure, Federal Procurement Regulations, monsterpiece, NISTwit
Comments Off on When to disclose inventions? Part II: Bayh-Dole, 2
When to disclose inventions? Part II: Bayh-Dole, 1
When to disclose a subject invention under Bayh-Dole? It doesn’t matter. Really. Let me explain. The Bayh-Dole Act applies to subject inventions. A subject invention is an invention (i) owned by a contractor (ii) that is or may be patentable … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet
Tagged Bayh-Dole, disclosure
Comments Off on When to disclose inventions? Part II: Bayh-Dole, 1
A century of reaping enormous profits at the expense of sickness and misfortune, 3
The Mayo doctors, having made their specific arguments with regard to salvarsan in their 1917 letter to Congress, end with a full scale plea, not only to cancel the patent for salvarsan but also for other German drugs, and for … Continue reading
A century of reaping enormous profits at the expense of sickness and misfortune, 1
In June 1917, the United States had just entered the first world war against Germany, and a German chemical maker through its American subsidiary Farbwerke-Hoechst held U.S. patents on salvarsan, a medicine used to treat syphilis. Along letters written on … Continue reading
“Promote” in Bayh-Dole, 4
In arguing in Public Citizen v NIH that secret exclusive deals were the only way the NIH could fulfill its public mission–or at least the mission of its patent licensing office–the NIH produced some interesting metrics. In 2000, the NIH … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet
Tagged Bayh-Dole, disclosure, exclusive license, fat, misery, NIH, promote, Public Citizen
Comments Off on “Promote” in Bayh-Dole, 4
“Promote” in Bayh-Dole, 3
We are working through the Public Citizen v NIH case. Public Citizen sought to make the NIH disclose key elements of its exclusive licensing practice, and NIH refused. The Court agreed with the NIH–that in the balance between public interest … Continue reading