Category Archives: Bayh-Dole

It's just compensation

There are two ways there could be just compensation.  The first form of compensation is the provision of federal funds in support of research proposed by PIs.  It’s their work that the government supports.   Invention rights are deliverables in that … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on It's just compensation

Whistling all the way to the bank

If  Bayh-Dole is a vesting statute, then it appears to be unconstitutional under the 5th Amendment. At the time of compulsory acquisition of title to inventions for public use, there’s no  just compensation. But hooray I think Bayh-Dole is constitutional, … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | 1 Comment

What Remains to Be Seen

I want to return to a paragraph from a previous post and go another direction with it: While the standard patents rights clause is indeed standard, the only two things about it that are standard are that it applies in … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on What Remains to Be Seen

(f)(2)–it's a hit!

I have been working through Bayh-Dole.  You may have noticed.   The question that comes up is how does title to subject inventions get from the inventors to universities?   There are three possibilities. 1) universities rely on their own patent agreements … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on (f)(2)–it's a hit!

The Constitution of Bayh-Dole

I promised one more angle on Stanford v. Roche.  Here it is.  Read on, if you must.   What happens if AUTM’s cruel world argument prevails?  Let’s say the Supreme Court goes, why yes, Bayh-Dole *is* a vesting statute.  Is that … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on The Constitution of Bayh-Dole

Mapping the Solution Space

What are some possible outcomes of Stanford v. Roche?  We will start out simple.  Then we will go into the darkness with a flickering candle. 1. AUTM is right and Bayh-Dole is a vesting statute.  Urk, cruel world. 2. The … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on Mapping the Solution Space

Odd discrepancies hop in

I was looking at the AUTM Practice Manual the other day.  The part about Bayh-Dole, written by a WARF attorney.  Funny, it argues that a university had better have an invention assignment policy to ensure that it can comply with … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on Odd discrepancies hop in

Looking for the Audit Wagons

Under the standard patent rights clause in Bayh-Dole (37 CFR 401.14(a)), a university taking title to subject inventions is restricted in its use of royalty income under section (k)(2) and (k)(3): (2) The contractor will share royalties collected on a … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on Looking for the Audit Wagons

Stewardship of Subject Inventions

When an invention is made, title to the invention—essentially the standing to file a patent application and have a patent issue in your name—is with the inventors.  Under the Patent Act, for that title to shift to anyone else, the … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on Stewardship of Subject Inventions

Bayh-Dole Review Time

Bayh-Dole is a law setting out how federal agencies contract with universities for invention rights. The key element is 37 CFR 401.14(a)(f)(2), the written agreements universities are to have with research employees that fully implement everything that Bayh-Dole is concerned with. Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Review Time