Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Author Archives: Gerald Barnett
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 25: Precarious Position on IP
[I have made a few edits for style and clarity, and one update of a citation based on NIST’s renumbering.] Had enough of Penn State? I sure have, but we are not done. Penn State is not an outlier in … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Sponsored Research
Tagged basic position, IP, Penn State
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 25: Precarious Position on IP
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 24: Fiduciary Duty
Penn State’s policy on conflict of interest, HR91, uses language that might be used to describe fiduciary duties. Penn State “faculty and staff members,” as a matter of policy, must use “utmost good faith” in their “duties to the University … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Policy
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 24: Fiduciary Duty
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 23: Conflict of Interest
Penn State’s conflict of interest policy, HR91, discusses requirements on “faculty and staff members”: In their dealings with and on behalf of the University, they shall be held to a strict rule of honest and fair dealings between themselves and … Continue reading
Posted in Bozonet, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 23: Conflict of Interest
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 22: Agency
For all the talk about conflict of interest in Penn State policies, Penn State does have a policy, HR91, that directly addresses conflict of interest. It’s odd that administrators can’t seem to focus their conflict of interest worries there and … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 22: Agency
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 21: Outside Activities
We are into Penn State’s policy on “Private Consulting Practice,” HR80. We arrive at, finally, a definition of “outside activity”–since one can be involved in outside consulting or merely go AWOL: Outside consulting or other professional activity or service, paid … Continue reading
Posted in Policy
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 21: Outside Activities
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 20: Consulting
Penn State’s policy on entrepreneurial activity, IP06, continues by reciting badly the university policy on consulting, at HR80. Yes, I suppose we have to look, having read the book. HR80 begins with an assertion about faculty duties: A faculty member … Continue reading
Posted in Policy
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 20: Consulting
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 19: Conflict of Commitment
Even with this critique we have not got to the bottom of Penn State’s policy treatment of conflict of interest/commitment as a covert IP policy. Conflicts of interest and/or commitment “exist” when someone has “preferential access” to knowledge or university … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 19: Conflict of Commitment
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 18: University Interests
Penn State’s policy on entrepreneurial activities opens with this claim: Technology transfer must be effected within the framework of an individual’s obligations to the University. Given what we have learned about Penn State’s policies on academic freedom, we might revise … Continue reading
Posted in Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 18: University Interests
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 17: Academic Freedom
Here’s the opening of Penn State’s policy on academic freedom (HR 64): Academic freedom refers to the environment provided by the University that permits faculty members to engage in their scholarly pursuits of teaching, research, and related activities at institutions … Continue reading
Penn State’s Protection Racket, 16: Entrepreneurial Activity
We worked through Penn State IP policies past (1940, 1991) and current, looked as well at the weirdness that is the IP Agreement (from 1992 and current), and discovered that for all that apparatus–poorly conceived and drafted–the only formal requirements … Continue reading
Posted in Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Penn State’s Protection Racket, 16: Entrepreneurial Activity