Author Archives: Gerald Barnett

Vannever Bush on the control of scientists

Here’s Vannever Bush on the institutional desire to control scientists: There is nothing more deadly than control of the activities of scientists and engineers by men who do not really understand, but think they do or must at least give … Continue reading

Posted in Freedom, Innovation, Vannever Bush | Tagged , | Comments Off on Vannever Bush on the control of scientists

Another NIST FAQ-up, 2

For the rest of NIST’s FAQ’d-up answer, let’s parse closely. NIST has just repeated the obvious–if an invention has been conceived and reduced to practice prior to federal funding, it is not a subject invention. The question, however, has to … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Another NIST FAQ-up, 2

Another NIST FAQ-up, 1

NIST doesn’t understand Bayh-Dole. Let’s take another look at their mind-numbing FAQ. Here’s the question NIST asks: Does an invention need to be reported if it was conceived before an award but reduced to practice as part of the award? This … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Another NIST FAQ-up, 1

Pensé and Perspectivability-2

I have been writing about my sense of perspective–something not possible in an infinite university, according to the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Though I have worked at and for universities in technology transfer for a couple of decades, I … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Pensé and Perspectivability-2

Pensé and Perspectivability-1

Some of you may have noticed that over the years I have grown more critical of the Bayh-Dole Act and especially of the people who prop it up with various forms of bluffery. The law is based on failed policy … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Pensé and Perspectivability-1

The VA gets a bit of Bayh-Dole

The Department of Veteran’s Affairs produced a template Cooperative Technology (Inventions) Administration Agreement available at a web site called Agreement Sample.  The template is modeled on a CRADA agreement, but instead of research, the agreement concerns the administration of inventions made … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The VA gets a bit of Bayh-Dole

Administrative lupus

I while ago I wrote an article on some suggestions for changing Bayh-Dole. The first suggestion was to add a research “exemption.” The authors–one a former senior university patent administrator from a very big university–were well meaning, and perhaps there … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Patents, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Administrative lupus

These are not the investors Congress was looking for

Universities routinely assign federally funded inventions to companies. They do so under the cover of an exclusive patent license, expecting that they won’t get caught. There are two kinds of exclusive license. In one, a true exclusive license, the licensee … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on These are not the investors Congress was looking for

Peace measures

In 1917, in the United States, six million people suffered from syphilis. The only drug that offered some relief at the time was an arsenic compound made in Germany called salvarsan. The United States entered the first world war against … Continue reading

Posted in History, Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Peace measures

Bayh-Dole inventor disclosure summary

Let’s summarize. Bayh-Dole does not require inventors to disclose inventions arising in federally supported research or development. It’s just not there. Go look. I’ll wait. Bayh-Dole does not require inventors to give up rights to their inventions.  It’s not there. … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole inventor disclosure summary