Author Archives: Gerald Barnett

A Little Lecture on Bayh-Dole

If you look at the list of purposes of the Bayh-Dole Act at 35 USC 200, you will find these elements: Use the patent system to promote the utilization of federally supported inventions encourage maximum participation of small business firms … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on A Little Lecture on Bayh-Dole

Invention and Expertise

University IP policy tends to implement a “great man of invention” assumption. This is easy to do, not necessarily intentional, and unforgivable for a research organization of any sophistication. The “great man of invention” model proposes that a dominant individual … Continue reading

Posted in Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Invention and Expertise

Software and Biotech Licensing

University technology transfer is dominated by the what can be called “biotech licensing” expectations. University administrators and licensing professionals tend to believe that “biotech” is where the money is, both now and historically, and that the primary means of getting … Continue reading

Posted in Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Software and Biotech Licensing

Posting Management

I have spent the last couple of months exploring other forms of discussion, including Linked-In discussion groups, Google groups, Twitter, Kyte, Wikis, Facebook, Plaxo, Spoke, conventional listserv discussions, and plain old email. My sense is that Linked-In discussions for the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Posting Management

Open Innovation and University Tech Transfer

Open innovation lies at the root of university technology transfer. The fundamental expectation in moving technology from basic research to industry requires that companies accept incoming technology. As soon as one is up against the “not invented here” syndrome, one … Continue reading

Posted in Commons, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Open Innovation and University Tech Transfer

Economic Development and TTX

Paul Wellings, Vice Chancellor at Lancaster University, apparently has come out with the idea that government policy should make clear that “the primary purpose of research commercialization is to benefit the economy as a whole, rather than create an income … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Economic Development and TTX

Layers Confusion

Folks confuse research and administrative layers in making research arrangements. Research is about the conduct of inquiry. It carries certain conventions. Folks don’t generally sign contracts to work together, publish together–it’s a complex household, where there are commitments and shared … Continue reading

Posted in Sponsored Research, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Layers Confusion

Confidentiality Agreements

There’s a topic header for this over at the University & Industry Innovation Forum. I’ve put a summary there. Here, I’ll post a fuller discussion. As with other areas of discussion on industry-university arrangements, confidentiality triggers cascades of reasoning. This … Continue reading

Posted in Sponsored Research | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Confidentiality Agreements

Other RTEI feeds

I am experimenting with other forms of interaction to engage folks in research enterprise topics. There’s a Twitter feed, not sure how valuable it may be, that tracks a bit of what I’m doing each day. Right now the feed … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Other RTEI feeds

RTEI IM

[RTEI IM is now a Twitter feed. Follow @umbut] An experiment. If you are working in a research environment that is facing a challenge, RTEI is available to offer general assistance. One way to get in touch is to use … Continue reading

Posted in Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer | Tagged | Comments Off on RTEI IM