Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Author Archives: Gerald Barnett
The March-In That Ain’t
I came across an interesting commentary by John Conley on the NIH’s refusal to exercise march-in rights under Bayh-Dole. The post is from January 2011 and has to do with the problems Genzyme has had producing an enzyme that helps … Continue reading
Research Shanzhai
In the Teece formulation, innovation represents a competition among first movers, imitators, and infrastructure. Each aims for a share of the value of something new and worthwhile. Patents might be thought to aid the inventor, giving him or her a … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Innovation, Policy, Shanzhai, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Research Shanzhai
Extending Affiliates Programs
“Affiliates programs” are generally donation-based financial support programs for university departments and schools. In exchange for a membership fee, an affiliate program participant gets various premiums–invitations to research reviews, open houses, and job fairs; access to university labs and faculty … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Commons, IP, Projects, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on Extending Affiliates Programs
If Siri were free of rights, would there be a Siri?
Here is another article out today, from Peter Cohan, arguing that the US patent system should be scrapped. Are we are well past being able to reform it? Cohan’s five reasons don’t include regulatory capture, market inefficiencies, the march to … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Innovation, IP, Policy
Comments Off on If Siri were free of rights, would there be a Siri?
The Basic Premise of University Invention Management
Use = Success There’s really not much to add. Infringement is not an option.
Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on The Basic Premise of University Invention Management
On Deliberately Weak IP Rhetorics
I mentioned Boldrin and Levine’s argument against patents. Their paper (it is posted but labeled a draft) is very uneven, moving between dubious assertions and insightful analysis. Lurking over their discussion, though they do not acknowledge it, is Teece’s paper … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, IP, Policy, Social Science
Comments Off on On Deliberately Weak IP Rhetorics
Patent Abolition
John Gruber at Daring Fireball draws attention to an article in the The Atlantic by Jordan Weissmann who reports on a paper from the Federal Reserve by Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine arguing for the abolition of patents. The … Continue reading
Cleese on Creativity
In a talk on Creativity (from 1991, it seems), complete with Danish subtitling to help expand your language competency, John Cleese talks about “open” and “closed” modes of operating, and the need to move between these two modes to find … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Social Science
Comments Off on Cleese on Creativity
Recovering Agent Choice
Having looked at the various topics Research Enterprise has covered over the past four years, it’s also good to look at where we are in terms of university innovation management. Prior to Bayh-Dole’s passage in 1980, university innovation practice was … Continue reading
Code 10-9
It’s been four years, now, that I’ve been writing for Research Enterprise. Over 450 comments, essays, technical discussions, and parody Star Trek scripts later, it’s time to take a look at where things stand. Over this period, Research Enterprise has … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Code 10-9