Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Author Archives: Gerald Barnett
How we got here in twelve chapters, 2
2. The equities University faculty develop an approach to patents—mostly, keep them out of the university, use Research Corporation or a local research foundation. Agents provide services, take on the costs and risks, and share upsides with inventors and institutions. … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, History, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on How we got here in twelve chapters, 2
How we got here in twelve chapters, 1
A few days ago I sat down to work on a curriculum for innovation and found myself distracted by the outline of a book-length treatment of the development of university “technology transfer.” I emerged a few hours later with a … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, History, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on How we got here in twelve chapters, 1
The Dag Wagging the Dog, Part 2
In Part 1 of “Dag Wagging Dog,” we looked again at Rev Proc 47-2007 and how university administrators have used this tax guidance to create an artificial barrier to industry-sponsored research. Now let’s turn to how the universities have used … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on The Dag Wagging the Dog, Part 2
The new university zombie IP policies
Migitating Private Business Use In a recent on-line article, Peter H. Serreze at Ropes & Gray, discusses private business use. The article offers strategies to mitigate the effect of the 5% limit on private business use (PBU) for the proceeds … Continue reading
Posted in Policy, Sponsored Research, Stanford v Roche
Tagged 2000-47, Delaware, mission, patent policy
Comments Off on The new university zombie IP policies
The Dag Wagging the Dog, Part 1
I have previously discussed Rev Proc 2007-47 and its forerunner Rev Proc 97-14. These “revenue procedures” set out an explanation by the Internal Revenue Service of how the research use of facilities financed with tax-free bonds could result in a determination … Continue reading
Posted in Policy, Sponsored Research
Comments Off on The Dag Wagging the Dog, Part 1
Rekindling
It’s Thanksgiving Day, and here I am up at 6am, taking care of the dog. She’s an early riser, so I am too. I’ve got a fire in the fireplace, and the espresso is brewing. I have been busy, so … Continue reading
University claims on non-supported inventive work
In a note on the Guide to Bayh-Dole, a reader asks: One point I have been particularly concerned with is the position taken by virtually all of the universities that if a university employee is hired as a consultant to … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Freedom, History, Policy, Technology Transfer
Comments Off on University claims on non-supported inventive work
You Make the Call–NIH Version
It’s time for you to test your reading ability with that of the aces at the NIH. Let’s see how well you can do! Here is NIH guidance on Bayh-Dole compliance for awardees of NIH grants: The Bayh-Dole Act includes … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Sponsored Research, Stanford v Roche
Comments Off on You Make the Call–NIH Version
That's what we all expect from you anyway.
We have had a time of it exposing the disingenuous claims by the University of Washington’s startup program. There is much more going on than the bits I’ve pointed out. But some folks would rather live the lie than restate their numbers … Continue reading
Lock-in and Value-add in University IP Management
John Gruber at Daring Fireball points out a new article by Dave Winer, the developer of the RSS feed. The article is about “lock-in”–the effort to capture users to a particular technology product (and its infrastructure) as a way to … Continue reading