What we learn from Stanford v. Roche

There are some valuable insights, but first the obvious.  Short form, big picture.

1.  Bayh-Dole is no vesting statute.

2.  Inventors own their inventions made with federal support.

3.  University administrators don’t understand Bayh-Dole or innovation.

4.  AUTM is an inventor-loathing monoculture.

5.  Bad advice to universities abounds.

 

This entry was posted in Bayh-Dole, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer. Bookmark the permalink.