Tag Archives: nonprofit

Inventors would own more, were it not for noncompliant Bayh-Dole practice

I saw this tweet this morning: I agree Inventors should own more, but institutions were/are the heart of Bayh-Dole that (arguably) enables IP-driven startups… this is bc many/most PI inventions would go into a black hole without tech transfer officer … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Metrics, Patents, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Inventors would own more, were it not for noncompliant Bayh-Dole practice

The consequences of Bayh-Dole non-disclosure of inventions, 3

Finally, we reach a non-empty consequence of an invention becoming a subject invention, even if not disclosed to the federal agency. This consequence has to do specifically with subject inventions made under the nonprofit patent rights clause. Bayh-Dole stipulates that … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The consequences of Bayh-Dole non-disclosure of inventions, 3

The consequences of Bayh-Dole non-disclosure of inventions, 1

If the federal government had the courage to enforce any one thing in Bayh-Dole, it would be the nonprofit assignment and accounting requirements at 35 USC 202(c)(7). The federal government taking title to non-disclosed subject inventions is mostly useless. Let … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The consequences of Bayh-Dole non-disclosure of inventions, 1

Would you believe still more on Can universities assign patent rights under Bayh-Dole?

The distinction between exclusive license and assignment also matters in Bayh-Dole practice. Bayh-Dole’s definition of funding agreement at 35 USC 201(b) makes clear that any assignment by a contractor extends the funding agreement–and necessarily the patent rights clause–to the assignee. … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Would you believe still more on Can universities assign patent rights under Bayh-Dole?

Oh wow. Implications of Bayh-Dole’s broad scope

For Bayh-Dole’s preemption to operate “uniformly,” Bayh-Dole’s scope has to be as broad as any federal statutes and executive branch patent policy that claim any federal interest in inventions arising from federally supported research or development. Since those statutes and … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Oh wow. Implications of Bayh-Dole’s broad scope

Subject invention reporting and federal funding agreements

It would be interesting to see an audit of university invention reporting practices, especially in light of the definition of “funding agreement” and what it means for an invention to be made “in the performance of work under a funding … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Subject invention reporting and federal funding agreements

The sound and fury of nonprofit assignments of subject inventions

Over the past few months I have returned the issue of exclusive licenses and assignments in Bayh-Dole. Here’s the operative requirement for nonprofits (35 USC 202(c)(7)(A)): (7) In the case of a nonprofit organization, (A) a prohibition upon the assignment of … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The sound and fury of nonprofit assignments of subject inventions