Tag Archives: license

Inventors would own more, were it not for noncompliant Bayh-Dole practice

I saw this tweet this morning: I agree Inventors should own more, but institutions were/are the heart of Bayh-Dole that (arguably) enables IP-driven startups… this is bc many/most PI inventions would go into a black hole without tech transfer officer … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Metrics, Patents, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Inventors would own more, were it not for noncompliant Bayh-Dole practice

On Technology Transfer Metrics, 2: Management

There are uses for metrics in business. One is to make management decisions. Consider this repeated bit of nonsense–you can’t manage what you don’t measure. There’s a veneer of truth in that, along the lines of “if you measure it, … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , | Comments Off on On Technology Transfer Metrics, 2: Management

Bayh-Dole march-in won’t change drug prices but other things might–2

Now let’s look at alternatives to Bayh-Dole’s march-in procedures to address competition, public access, and prevention of unreasonable use, including price gouging. We will consider two within Bayh-Dole and two outside Bayh-Dole. The Bayh-Dole alternatives are: use the government license … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, high priced drugs, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole march-in won’t change drug prices but other things might–2

Bayh-Dole march-in won’t change drug prices but other things might–1

Folks think that somehow Bayh-Dole permits government take over of pharma patents and by doing this, somehow, the price of drugs will necessarily–magically–go down. Let’s work through this idea. Set aside for a moment that many drugs don’t do much … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, high priced drugs, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole march-in won’t change drug prices but other things might–1

University inventions that aren’t exactly worthless-2

Companies, it turns out, are pretty good at evaluating inventions that are “worth” something to them. Companies with large research enterprises appear to be less good than others, however. The story at Xerox PARC was that inventors hoped that their … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on University inventions that aren’t exactly worthless-2

Institutional Patent Licensing–One of the least “direct” ways to obtain new technology

A few weeks ago I was involved in a discussion about how a region might import new technology developed at distant universities. One of the participants, with a background in AUTM-style technology transfer, made the off-hand comment that if we … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Freedom, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Institutional Patent Licensing–One of the least “direct” ways to obtain new technology

How can universities demonstrate they aren’t patent trolls?

Let’s say, just for the sake of argument, that university administrators at places like Caltech don’t want to be labelled patent trolls. What might make it clear that universities are not just one more set of patent trolls? “We’re not … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Commons, Freedom, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on How can universities demonstrate they aren’t patent trolls?