Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Tag Archives: 35 USC 261
Stanford v Roche was not about how to make Bayh-Dole into a vesting statute
The Stanford v Roche decision was not at all about the proper technical steps to make Bayh-Dole into a vesting statute. Even the Court’s minority opinion–what the lawyer-krakkens fixated on–was a musing on whether there should be any difference in the equitable ownership of an … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Stanford v Roche
Tagged 35 USC 200-212, 35 USC 261, Bayh-Dole, Stanford v Roche, vesting
Comments Off on Stanford v Roche was not about how to make Bayh-Dole into a vesting statute