Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Twitter
My TweetsUseful Web Sites
Category Archives: Technology Transfer
Nicotine Patches, 4
Let’s review where we have got to in this dive into the history of nicotine patches. The UC did not transfer technology in the nicotine patch case. Ciba-Geigy did not need the UC technology–it seems to have wanted the patent … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer
Tagged Alza, Ciba-Geigy, nicotine, patch, replacement therapy
Comments Off on Nicotine Patches, 4
Nicotine Patches, 3
Now for the University of California, Los Angeles. The Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) wrote up the UC nicotine patch story with the headline “Turning Quitters Into Winners: The Nicotine Patch Success Story” as part of their “Better World … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer
Tagged nicotine patch, replacement therapy, UCLA, University of California
Comments Off on Nicotine Patches, 3
Nicotine Patches, 2
We are working through the history of nicotine patches, to learn what we can from UC’s claim to have invented the nicotine patch, and AUTM’s claim that this is a success story, and the Bayh-Dole Coalition’s claim that this success … Continue reading
Posted in Technology Transfer
Tagged Alza, Etscorn, Nicorette, Pharmetrix
Comments Off on Nicotine Patches, 2
What Bayh-Dole has stolen from us
In an article published August 29, 2021 in The Intercept, Alexander Zaitchik describes the passage of the Bayh-Dole Act as “The Great American Science Heist,” with the subtitle “How the Bayh-Dole Act Wrested Public Science From the People’s Hands.” He … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Technology Transfer, Vannever Bush
Tagged Bayh-Dole, Rickover, Zaitchik
Comments Off on What Bayh-Dole has stolen from us
The use of the patent system for federal research results, 11: Safeguards that don’t guard
We have been working through Federal Security Agency order 110-1, which in 1952 introduced an agency-wide policy for inventions made in public health research. The core of the policy was to prefer open access for all such inventions, but then … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged development, free rider, safeguard, waste, widest distribution
Comments Off on The use of the patent system for federal research results, 11: Safeguards that don’t guard
The use of the patent system for federal research results, 10: the drivers that eventually produce Bayh-Dole
There’s the version of the theory of patent rights that asserts that exclusionary practice is at the heart of the value of a patent, and any practice that declines to assert a patent wastes that value. This theory of exclusionary … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged exclusion, patent, safeguard, technology transfer
Comments Off on The use of the patent system for federal research results, 10: the drivers that eventually produce Bayh-Dole
The use of the patent system for federal research results, 8: Exploiting the use of the patent system
FSA policy 110, the first agency attempt at making a policy to deal with inventions made in federally supported public health research, tries to establish a middle ground for the use of patents. While clearly endorsing open access, including royalty-free … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, History, Policy, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer
Tagged 110, exploit, FSA, middle ground, open access
Comments Off on The use of the patent system for federal research results, 8: Exploiting the use of the patent system
Funnel vision and university default exclusive licensing
Much of the current, dominant narrative about patents at universities depends on looking isolating single inventions at a single institution with a single profile for use. “Inventions,” so this narrative go, will not be used or developed unless for each … Continue reading
Posted in Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged defection, exclusive licensing, funnel, narrative, patent, technology transfer, turdly
Comments Off on Funnel vision and university default exclusive licensing
Learning from Latker’s 1984 “Federal Initiatives for Innovation” Talk
In 1984 Norman Latker, who as NIH patent counsel drafted the Bayh-Dole Act on the sly, gave a talk (“Federal Initiatives For Innovation“) to the American Intellectual Property Association. At the time, Latker worked for the Department of Commerce, and … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Technology Transfer, Vannever Bush
Tagged Bayh-Dole, Latker
Comments Off on Learning from Latker’s 1984 “Federal Initiatives for Innovation” Talk
UW’s Fast Start template, another bad bureaucratic idea gone bad, 7
We have been working through the arguments for universities implementing one-size-fits-all licensing templates for their spinout companies, so that all spinouts are treated the same–as if university spinouts are all the same, or should be made to become all the … Continue reading
Posted in Agreements, Policy, Technology Transfer
Tagged conflict of interest, FAST, spinout, startup
Comments Off on UW’s Fast Start template, another bad bureaucratic idea gone bad, 7