Author Archives: Gerald Barnett

NIAID Breezily Repudiates Supreme Court Ruling

Perhaps you wanted a short version. NIAID puts this in guidance to inventors regarding inventions made in NIH-funded work: Under the Bayh-Dole Act, your institution as the grant recipient owns rights to the NIH-funded invention and has the right and … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on NIAID Breezily Repudiates Supreme Court Ruling

NIAID botches Bayh-Dole

This will be a bit of a long ride. Buckle up. In 2011, the US Supreme Court ruled in Stanford v Roche that the Bayh-Dole Act does not vest title to inventions made in federally supported work with the nonprofit … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on NIAID botches Bayh-Dole

A university technology transfer annotated reading list

So you want to tell heaven from hell, blue skies from pain. Got it! Here is a basic reading list of documents that frame the history of university technology transfer. I’ve put it in chronological order and provide links to … Continue reading

Posted in Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A university technology transfer annotated reading list

The Bayh-Dole Public Bargain, 2

Baked into Bayh-Dole is the policy expectation that a holder of a patent on a subject invention will offer products based on that invention as if there were competition, even if a patent is used to suppress that competition. In … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Bayh-Dole Public Bargain, 2

The Bayh-Dole Public Bargain, 1

Bayh-Dole is directed at federal agencies contracting for research or development with small businesses and nonprofits. The law requires agencies to use a default patent rights clause in every funding agreement unless an agency can justify a different clause. The … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Bayh-Dole Public Bargain, 1

An Open Letter to Senator Warren Regarding Xtandi

Dear Senator Warren: You have called repeatedly for the federal government to use regulatory tools available to it to address the high prices charged for drugs. Your attention to this matter is much appreciated! I write with specific reference to … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on An Open Letter to Senator Warren Regarding Xtandi

Smells Like Bayh-Dole Spirit

Bayh-Dole has two main concerns: contractor patent rights (35 USC 202-204) and federal agency disposition of patents (35 USC 207-209). These two sets of provisions work together in odd but let’s say intended ways. For instance, 35 USC 207(a)(2) authorizes … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Smells Like Bayh-Dole Spirit

The Bluntly Essence of Bayh-Dole’s Contracting Provisions

Let’s be super bluntly. The essence of Bayh-Dole’s contracting provisions is: Make new product available promptly, and at a competitive price. That’s it. That’s what all the apparatus and fuss is about, and what federal agencies refuse to recognize or … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Bluntly Essence of Bayh-Dole’s Contracting Provisions

Cornboard, Part 2

Despite various announcements about possible products and manufacturing, Cornboard Manufacturing appears not to have manufactured much of anything by the time the Illinois patent expired in 2016. Although the company did not “disappear” like Illinois’s first exclusive licensee, it did … Continue reading

Posted in Patents, Startups | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Cornboard, Part 2

Cornboard, Part 1

The Bayh-Dole Coalition, an evidence-free lobbying organization in support of not enforcing Bayh-Dole’s public protections, tweeted today a “success” story: Success Story! @UofIllinois 3 Researchers developed a product known as “CornBoard”, a way to make composite materials from corn to … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Patents, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Cornboard, Part 1