Tag Archives: technology transfer

9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 2

We are working through a list of nine things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do. It’s worth the review because there are all sorts of claims out there–almost never contested–about what Bayh-Dole requires. Most of it is nonsense. And … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 9 things Bayh-Dole does not require universities to do, part 2

Fantasy depictions of technology transfer, 2

The standard accounts of the “technology transfer process” seem so clear and plausible that you may well believe they are generally accurate, even if there might be “technical details” that they gloss over. But these standard accounts are largely, almost … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Fantasy depictions of technology transfer, 2

Fantasy depictions of technology transfer

People play innovation policy with stick drawings. Inventions are depicted as proto-products rather than as broad swaths of potential. Patents “protect” inventions from competing use that would discourage private purchase and speculation. A patent is depicted as merely excluding competing … Continue reading

Posted in Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Fantasy depictions of technology transfer

Pensé and Perspectivability-2

I have been writing about my sense of perspective–something not possible in an infinite university, according to the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Though I have worked at and for universities in technology transfer for a couple of decades, I … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Pensé and Perspectivability-2

Nine Points to Consider (with regard to AUTM’s licensing survey), 1-7

The Association of University Technology Managers, a front group for university licensing professionals, conducts an annual survey of the universities that its members work for. The survey asks for various metrics regarding inventions, patenting, licensing, startups, and revenue. The survey … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Metrics, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Nine Points to Consider (with regard to AUTM’s licensing survey), 1-7

Two Published Accounts of University Licensing: WARF and Stanford

Universities generally keep secret their licensing metrics. Yes, they report the number of inventions, patents, licenses, and startups in a given year–but they don’t report how those numbers relate to one another. The inventions reported in a given year have … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Two Published Accounts of University Licensing: WARF and Stanford

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 6

We are working through the advice that AAU, APLU, and other “higher education associations” have provided to NIST on how to improve federal laboratory technology transfer. Do you expect that these associations thoroughly vetted their draft response with all their … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 6

Some reading for technology transfer professionals

Every so often I have asked people what articles ought to be required reading for people in university technology transfer. One great suggestion is David Teece’s “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.” Another has … Continue reading

Posted in Technology Transfer | Tagged , | Comments Off on Some reading for technology transfer professionals

The bozonet on mount stupid

I mentioned “mount stupid” last week in a three-part article on the University of Utah. Mount stupid is a bit of a meme derived from accounts of the Dunning-Kruger effect, which I have referred to in developing an account of … Continue reading

Posted in Bozonet, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The bozonet on mount stupid

The Special Case Keeps Giving

Here is the special case university research invention. I have expanded it to show the logic. A special case invention is one that cannot be used without “development” and the “development” involves substantial effort at private expense and the “development” … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Innovation, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Special Case Keeps Giving