Tag Archives: subject invention

Undisclosed subject inventions made in development and commercialization contracts

A note on subject inventions not disclosed under Bayh-Dole–and a place for auditors to romp and play as auditors are wont to do, if auditors were ever to romp and play with regard to anything consequential in Bayh-Dole. What follows … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bayh-Dole’s Ruby Slippers

This is a story about 35 USC 201(b), 35 USC 202(a), 37 CFR 401.9, and 37 CFR 401.14(f)(2) and (g)(1). These provisions of Bayh-Dole, implementing regulations, and standard patent rights clause, when read together, create ruby slippers. The story requires … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ten Year Note

Ten years ago, on September 4, 2008, I started the Research Enterprise blog. My idea was to use the blog to document what I had learned about university-based technology transfer over 15 years of licensing practice, and to describe ways … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bayh-Dole Basics, 7: Disclosure comments, 2

We are working through the details of Bayh-Dole’s requirement that all subject inventions must be disclosed. What are subject inventions? What is the scope of a funding agreement? Who must disclose? What is the nature of the disclosure? Good questions, … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Basics, 7: Disclosure comments, 2

AUTM’s invitation to delude yourself, 3

To show how clueless the universities have been about Bayh-Dole–look at this finding from the GAO’s 1998 report on university administration of Bayh-Dole inventions: The policies varied among the universities in connection with how they determined whether the invention was … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on AUTM’s invitation to delude yourself, 3

When experts cheat at Bayh-Dole

In the classic guide to cheating at cards, The Expert at the Card Table, the point gets made that an expert cheater can cheat regardless of the watchfulness of anyone who expects him or her to cheat. An expert cheat … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on When experts cheat at Bayh-Dole

Bayh-Dole applies only to subject inventions

Bayh-Dole applies only to inventions owned by a contractor Bayh-Dole applies only to subject inventions. Supreme Court: the Bayh-Dole Act . . . applies only to “subject inventions”—“inventions of the contractor” Subject inventions are patentable inventions made in work under … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole applies only to subject inventions

The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 7

We have come full circle through NIH’s garbled version of Bayh-Dole, having been referred by the NIH’s SBIR guidance back to the NIH’s policy manual regarblization of Bayh-Dole in section 8.2.4. Section 8.2 has a bunch of data and research … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 7

The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 6

Research Enterprise has been examining the NIH’s representation of Bayh-Dole. So far we have seen that the NIH persists in citing a 1995 document that gives “guidance” that the Supreme Court in Stanford v Roche (2011) rejected. But the NIH … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 6

The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 5

We are working NIH’s not so tasty guidance to participants in its SBIR and STTR programs directed at small businesses. We reach the NIH’s account of the “principal features” of Bayh-Dole, at least with regard to “intellectual property” requirements: Principal … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The NIH’s View of Bayh-Dole Compliance, 5