Tag Archives: patent policy

A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-5

We are working through Yale’s “Patent Policy Acknowledgement & Agreement.” We have been looking at Paragraph 6 of the Yale patent policy to try to make sense of what inventions Yale really does assert an interest in. Paragraph 6 demands … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-5

A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-4

We are working through Yale’s “Patent Policy Acknowledgement & Agreement.” Most recently we borked about employment and faculty freedom. Now let’s look at how the agreement deals with consulting. It tries to worry the problem of conflicting obligations–Yale doesn’t want … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-4

A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-3

We are working through Yale’s “Patent Policy Acknowledgement & Agreement.” The agreement requires personnel signing it to “abide” by Yale’s patent policy, as if that patent policy does not apply but for this agreement. That’s a bit odd. Even odder, … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-3

A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-2

Now let’s look at a “Patent Policy Acknowledgement & Agreement” from Yale University. Here it is: Yale’s web site asserts that this agreement is required “for grant and patent compliance.” That’s a strange combination–grant and patent. One might think grant … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A non-compliant Bayh-Dole written agreement at Yale-2

An invention is not a thing, 6: Invention holes, practical application, and development

An invention is a collection of things, a set, a door of opportunity and whatever an inventor and others see through that door. A patent is an inventor’s claim to exclusivity in what the inventor, perhaps with help from others, … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on An invention is not a thing, 6: Invention holes, practical application, and development

The Basic Policy Question Behind Bayh-Dole

There’s one simple issue: Should the federal government subsidize with public funding for nonprofit research the creation of patent monopolies? There it is. The answer that has dominated for thirty-five years is “Yes.” How comfortable are you with that? Gut-level? … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Policy, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Basic Policy Question Behind Bayh-Dole

The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, Table of Links

In May 2017 I wrote a series of articles that traced the development of the University of Wisconsin’s patent policy, how the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation shaped federal policy to disenfranchise faculty inventors in favor of its own money-making ventures … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, Table of Links

Penn State’s IP Protection Racket, 1: Working Through the 1991 IP Policy

Hey, let’s compare Penn State’s “Intellectual Property Agreement” from 1992 with the present version. I know, just what you were hoping to do today–identify  policy changes to see how Penn State created its IP protection racket. To get there, we’ll … Continue reading

Posted in Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Penn State’s IP Protection Racket, 1: Working Through the 1991 IP Policy

The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 9

The beginning: The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 1 Research deliverables Bayh-Bole, as it turns out, will be a statute that limits the scope of patent property rights in federally supported inventions, but in such an obtuse way that … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Sponsored Research | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 9

The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 5

Start here: The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 1 The new 1969 Wisconsin patent policy broadens the scope of the university’s interest in patents yet further: Here is the Wisconsin IPA definition of “subject invention”: Both elements are essential … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Sponsored Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 5