Tag Archives: metrics

On Technology Transfer Metrics, 3: Money

Universities don’t track their transfers, the federal government does not track university transfers, and professional organizations and nonprofits do not track university transfers. Law firms don’t track university transfers. Venture capital firms don’t track university transfers. Pretty much anyone who … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

On Technology Transfer Metrics, 2: Management

There are uses for metrics in business. One is to make management decisions. There’s a repeated bit of nonsense–you can’t manage what you don’t measure. There’s a veneer in truth in that, along the lines of “if you measure it, … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

On Technology Transfer Metrics, 1: Issues

Let’s follow up on the fact that there’s no publicly available–free–data source to track university to industry technology transfer. There’s no non-free data source to track such transfer, either. You would think there would be. To get at metrics, let’s … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Nine Points to Consider (with regard to AUTM’s licensing survey), 1-7

The Association of University Technology Managers, a front group for university licensing professionals, conducts an annual survey of the universities that its members work for. The survey asks for various metrics regarding inventions, patenting, licensing, startups, and revenue. The survey … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Metrics, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Nine Points to Consider (with regard to AUTM’s licensing survey), 1-7

Nonsense about Bayh-Dole from Bio, 2018 edition–1

Let’s look at a new infographic from Bio about Bayh-Dole. It’s largely the same as the old infographics. The point of the infographic is to create the impression that the Bayh-Dole Act has been wildly successful and that any effort … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Nonsense about Bayh-Dole from Bio, 2018 edition–1

Two Published Accounts of University Licensing: WARF and Stanford

Universities generally keep secret their licensing metrics. Yes, they report the number of inventions, patents, licenses, and startups in a given year–but they don’t report how those numbers relate to one another. The inventions reported in a given year have … Continue reading

Posted in Metrics | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Two Published Accounts of University Licensing: WARF and Stanford

Key Concepts 1: Dual Monopoly

Dual Monopoly A dual monopoly approach to innovation management involves both a comprehensive institutional demand for ownership of inventive work and an institutional determination to convey monopolies in that work for private exploitation. The first monopoly is an institutional one. … Continue reading

Posted in Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Key Concepts 1: Dual Monopoly