Tag Archives: IPA

Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-4

We are working through the details of prior treatments of what becomes “reasonable terms” in Bayh-Dole’s definition of “practical application.” This definition in turn becomes the threshold for federal agency march-in under 35 USC 203(a)(1)–the first of the four march-in … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-4

Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-3

We are working through the NIH’s Institutional Patent Agreement master template to establish the context for Bayh-Dole’s use of “reasonable terms” in its definition of practical application, which in turn establishes the march-in threshold for 35 USC 203(a)(1), one of … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-3

Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-2

Now we get to government rights under march in. Here we have complications. In 1968, Norman Latker, NIH’s patent counsel, revived the Institutional Patent Agreement program, under which the NIH (and later the NSF) contracted with nonprofits so that a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole Basics, 8: Reasonable Terms Comments-2

Bayh-Dole is thin soup when it comes to federal innovation policy

NIST wants march-in for Bayh-Dole’s section 203(a)(2) and (3) to be for “national emergencies” only. Section (a)(2) concerns health or safety needs that are not “reasonably satisfied.” Section (a)(3) concerns regulatory requirements that are not “reasonably satisfied.”  But the *price* … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole is thin soup when it comes to federal innovation policy

Invention Option Theory and Bayh-Dole Crock Work

At one point, many years ago, I thought Bayh-Dole was totally clever. I was very wrong, but here’s how I thought Bayh-Dole worked. The federal government had a general claim under federal law to own any invention made under federal … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, History | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Invention Option Theory and Bayh-Dole Crock Work

WARF, Vitamin D, and the Public Interest, 2

We have worked through a 1945 appeals court reasoning about the University of Wisconsin’s president’s refusal to allow the licensing of an invention beneficial to public health for use in food products that might compete with State of Wisconsin dairy … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Commons, History, Policy | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on WARF, Vitamin D, and the Public Interest, 2

The monopoly meme, 3

We are working through Howard Bremer’s testimony before a Senate subcommittee with regard to a bill remarkably like what would become Bayh-Dole. The point is to explore how the monopoly meme works in practice. Bremer gives nine principles that ought … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Freedom, History, Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The monopoly meme, 3

Only Bayh-Dole and University Research Enterprise, 1

Let’s talk only Bayh-Dole and university research. Companies didn’t need Bayh-Dole for the most part, since executive branch patent policy allowed federal agencies to permit company contractors to keep inventions made under federal contracts when they acquired those inventions. There … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Sponsored Research | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Only Bayh-Dole and University Research Enterprise, 1

Another garbled account of Bayh-Dole

A new article considering Bayh-Dole asks whether it’s time to rewrite Bayh-Dole. That’s a legitimate question to ask. Unfortunately, the article gets wrong much about Bayh-Dole the way it is. But even a garbled article can prompt a discussion that helps … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Another garbled account of Bayh-Dole

The “fix” in Bayh-Dole

People worry at times that there is a “gap” or “flaw” in Bayh-Dole. They see the problem to be that Bayh-Dole doesn’t out and decree that all inventions made with federal support are owned (or to be owned) by the … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The “fix” in Bayh-Dole