Tag Archives: Harbridge House

The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, Table of Links

In May 2017 I wrote a series of articles that traced the development of the University of Wisconsin’s patent policy, how the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation shaped federal policy to disenfranchise faculty inventors in favor of its own money-making ventures … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, Table of Links

Bayh-Dole nonsense in a talk at the University of Pittsburgh

Last year (March 2016), Joe Allen gave a talk at the University of Pittsburgh, “Patent Ownership Under Bayh-Dole, reported in the University Times. Called “a key architect of the Bayh-Dole Act,” Allen manages to fill a talk summary with mostly … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole nonsense in a talk at the University of Pittsburgh

The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 13

Things start here: The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 1 The Harbridge House report According to the Harbridge House report on federal patent policy, from the 1930s until the 1950s, the pharmaceutical industry was the primary source of funding … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Policy, Sponsored Research | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 13

Bayh-Dole has dropped commercialization rates from 25% to 0.5%: what more can we expect?

University licensing programs appear to have about a 0.5% commercialization rate. That is, of all the assets reported to them which they claim, only 1 in 200 (or less) actually results in a commercial product (without regard to the “success” … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Commons, History, Metrics, Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bayh-Dole has dropped commercialization rates from 25% to 0.5%: what more can we expect?