Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Top 48 Hour View List
- The Cork in the Keg: Open Source Software Complies with Bayh-Dole But University Invention Practice Often Does Not
- Negotiating a share of royalties under Bayh-Dole
- Federal law on inventions made with federal support, 2
- Bush v Kilgore v the Old Order v Now
- Illusions of Bayh-Dole: "manufactured substantially" 3
Useful Web Sites
Tag Archives: 35 USC 202(a)
Does Bayh-Dole Require a Written Assignment?
Does Bayh-Dole require a written assignment? No. But Bayh-Dole is screwy. I’ll elaborate. Look all you want, there’s no assignment requirement in Bayh-Dole. Heck, the Supreme Court looked for an assignment requirement and couldn’t find it. Here’s how the majority … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged 35 USC 202(a), 37 CFR 401.9, assignment, Bayh-Dole
Comments Off on Does Bayh-Dole Require a Written Assignment?
Bayh-Dole’s Ruby Slippers
This is a story about 35 USC 201(b), 35 USC 202(a), 37 CFR 401.9, and 37 CFR 401.14(f)(2) and (g)(1). These provisions of Bayh-Dole, implementing regulations, and standard patent rights clause, when read together, create ruby slippers. The story requires … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole
Tagged (f)(2), 35 USC 202(a), Bayh-Dole, contractor, ruby slippers, subject invention
Comments Off on Bayh-Dole’s Ruby Slippers