Category Archives: Technology Transfer

Ten Year Note

Ten years ago, on September 4, 2008, I started the Research Enterprise blog. My idea was to use the blog to document what I had learned about university-based technology transfer over 15 years of licensing practice, and to describe ways … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Innovation, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Ten Year Note

Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 7

The 2013 version of the PHS Technology Transfer Manual 607.1 on exceptional circumstances lists a set of questions that ought to be considered by those in an NIH institute or center (IC) in preparing a determination of exceptional circumstances. These … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer | Tagged , | Comments Off on Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 7

Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 4

In more plain language, even with regard to outcomes, Bayh-Dole is crappy public policy. At best, Bayh-Dole has enabled a betting parlor managed by nonprofits for the future value of patent rights, especially those patents directed at controlling the “market” … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , | Comments Off on Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 4

Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 3

“Exceptional” circumstances are not stated by Bayh-Dole to be rare or unusual ones–they could be common. Exceptional circumstances are those circumstances in which Bayh-Dole’s arbitrary default at 35 USC 202(a) is not the best thing for promoting the policy and … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , | Comments Off on Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 3

Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 2

Here’s the slide from Dr. Thomas that starts our descent into darkness. Part of the slide contents is accurate. Part is slipped. Let’s take up the slipped. First, Bayh-Dole does not say the federal government “retains patent rights” when the … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Exceptional Circumstances in Bayh-Dole, 2

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 7

Frankly, I am weary of working through the HEAs’ nonsense advice to NIST. I expect you are too. Bullshit is so much more difficult to pin down than carefully reasoned discussion. It’s worth respecting carefully reasoned discussion, even if one … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 7

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 4

We are dealing with the bombast that AAU and other “higher education associations” put forward as advice to NIST with regard to how the federal government might better manage its own technology transfer. Instead, the HEAs seek to improve their … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 4

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 2

We are working through advice offered to NIST by various higher education associations on how to improve federal technology transfer by funding without oversight the “technology transfer” programs of non-federal institutions. If the gist is all you  need, then don’t … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Metrics, Open Source, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 2

Best practices in university invention management, 2

We are working through an article in the ipHandbook that argues for “best practices” in university ownership of inventions.  The article spends little time discussing how faculty are employed in their research work, nor the other requirements of university policy … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Best practices in university invention management, 2

Best practices in university invention management, 1

Things get complicated that don’t have to be complicated when it comes to university ownership of inventions. Administrators make things complicated, then argue for lots of money to pay for the talent to navigate those complications, and then more money … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bozonet, Freedom, Policy, Stanford v Roche, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Best practices in university invention management, 1