Category Archives: Projects

Thinking about projects, small and big–1

Let’s consider “big” projects. A project can be bigger than any particular part of it described by a particular budget to support specific work. Similarly, an invention can be bigger than any given patent filed on some part of it. … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Policy, Projects | Comments Off on Thinking about projects, small and big–1

Thinking about projects, small and big–0

People talk about creating patent rights from inventions. That’s a way of creating an IP position from a NIPIA position. An invention is not IP–it’s NIPIA. But in this talk, people are generally oblivious to the importance of creating projects … Continue reading

Posted in Projects | Comments Off on Thinking about projects, small and big–0

Thinking about projects, small and big– (-1)

A fundamental concept in university research enterprise is the project. In management-speak, the project is the key intangible asset created in research enterprise, the key form of NIPIA–“non-IP intangible asset.” A project is the soil in which the tubers of … Continue reading

Posted in Policy, Projects | Comments Off on Thinking about projects, small and big– (-1)

The Bayh-Dole implications of “big” projects created by university policies and practices

In the usual depictions of the Bayh-Dole Act, the emphasis gets put on university ownership of inventions made with federal support. What is not pointed out is that Bayh-Dole not only allows (but does not require) such ownership, but makes … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Policy, Projects | Comments Off on The Bayh-Dole implications of “big” projects created by university policies and practices

On Exclusive Licenses For Research Technology

Here’s a response I wrote for a research team that is working through issues regarding the licensing of their inventive technology. The team is spread across multiple institutions in multiple countries, working on an enabling technology in medical engineering. ***** The … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Projects, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on On Exclusive Licenses For Research Technology

Say so long to your abusive patent policy

Let’s be blunt. The compulsory, comprehensive, portfolio approach to university invention management is a disaster. It has a rate of 0.1% to 0.5% producing new products. It is 100x less effective than the approach it displaced. When you try to … Continue reading

Posted in Freedom, Policy, Projects | Comments Off on Say so long to your abusive patent policy

Change state law

Restoring voluntary assignment for university inventors is the first step in reconditioning university invention management–and putting that management on a road of development consistent with university mores and roles. Voluntary assignment can be accomplished a number of ways. I will … Continue reading

Posted in Policy, Projects, Sponsored Research | Comments Off on Change state law

Cockroach Living in Technology Transfer

I didn’t intend to end up in university technology transfer, but I fell down a rabbit hole and here I still am. I have seen university technology transfer from both sides now. For 12 years, I worked for the University … Continue reading

Posted in History, Projects, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Cockroach Living in Technology Transfer

How university exclusive patent licensing suppresses commercialization pathways

A number of university licensing officers have made a big deal about exclusive patent licenses. The exclusive license, they argue, is the key advantage they have over the federal government’s typical approach to invention management. The purpose of the Bayh-Dole … Continue reading

Posted in Agreements, Projects, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on How university exclusive patent licensing suppresses commercialization pathways

Transferwell

I followed a link from Kottke.org to an Atlantic Monthly article by Derek Thompson about how to choose a charity to support based on effectiveness of action rather than effectiveness of pitch or pride of place. The counter-example Thompson gives is … Continue reading

Posted in Policy, Projects, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Transferwell