Category Archives: Metrics

Government Interest Patent Activity 1976 to 2016, Part 1

I ran some patent numbers over the past week using the USPTO web search interface. It’s not the easiest search environment to use, and I don’t expect the numbers to be precise. But I expect the numbers are accurate enough to … Continue reading

Posted in History, IP, Metrics | Leave a comment

Bayh-Dole’s Mandate to Break-up Patent Monopolies on Subject Inventions

In the past few months, I have spent a good deal of time on the Bayh-Dole Act. One of the great challenges of dealing with Bayh-Dole is to get past what university patent brokers say the law “is” and get … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Metrics | Leave a comment

Evidence-based federal research patent policy

The Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking is holding a public hearing in Chicago in January for “any interested stakeholders” to provide input. Given that the commission’s statutory mandate is more toward database access and security, I’m not sure that the lack … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Metrics, Policy | Leave a comment

Bayh-Dole has dropped commercialization rates from 25% to 0.5%: what more can we expect?

University licensing programs appear to have about a 0.5% commercialization rate. That is, of all the assets reported to them which they claim, only 1 in 200 (or less) actually results in a commercial product (without regard to the “success” … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Commons, History, Metrics, Policy | Leave a comment

Documented and undocumented technology transfer programs

Recently, the University of California, in an internal report on its technology transfer program, indicated that its commercialization rate was 0.5%–1 invention in 200 got to the point of a commercial product. There was no indication whether those commercial products … Continue reading

Posted in Bozonet, Commons, Freedom, Metrics, Policy | Leave a comment

What’s uniform and what should never be, Part 2

In 1963, President Kennedy created a government-wide federal policy to address when and how federal agencies might consider allowing patent rights to remain with a contractor–any contractor, not just universities, and under any contract–not just procurement but also grants-in-aid or subventions. From … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, History, Metrics, Sponsored Research, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Demonstrate that Bayh-Dole isn’t a disaster

Okay, folks. Here’s your challenge. Demonstrate that Bayh-Dole isn’t a disaster and university patent licensing practice isn’t also a disaster. Here are some observations. Produce evidence to show they are wrong. 1. Commercialization under Bayh-Dole is 100x worse than under the private … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Metrics | Leave a comment

Has Bayh-Dole Been Successful?

I answered a Quora question a while back. I thought I’d repost it here. The question was: Has the Bayh-Dole act been successful? Just over 30 years old, the Bayh-Dole Act has set the path for most research universities and … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Metrics | Leave a comment

Bayh-Dole, the franken-sausage god

The full title is: Bayh-Dole, the franken-sausage god that destroyed private initiative and the federal research commons, eliminated subvention from university research policy and failed to create a public covenant to use research inventions to develop new products and create new industries … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Commons, History, Innovation, Metrics, Policy, Sponsored Research | 1 Comment

Should universities manage patents like corporations do?

We have discussed how university-owned patents are not like other patents. A university owner of patents is not free to do just anything with a patent. A university-held patent is not simply a property right–there are limitations (though many university patent administrators are … Continue reading

Posted in IP, Litigation, Metrics, Policy | Leave a comment