Search the RE article base
Contact Information
Top 48 Hour View List
Useful Web Sites
Category Archives: Freedom
WARF, Vitamin D, and the Public Interest, 1
In the 1940s, WARF was basking in the income from licensing its flagship patents–on a way to irradiate food products to produce in them vitamin D. (For an interesting account with lots of details, see Rima D. Apple (a University … Continue reading
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Freedom, History, Policy
Tagged margarine, monopoly meme, vitamin D, Vitamin Technologists, WARF
Comments Off on WARF, Vitamin D, and the Public Interest, 1
Shaping Science
A short version of a Research Enterprise article on Daniel Sarewitz’s “Saving Science” is posted as correspondence at The New Atlantis, where Sarewitz also responds to various comments on his paper. In part, Sarewitz gathers some of those comments into … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, Innovation, Policy, Vannever Bush
Tagged Daniel Sarewitz, free play, mephitis, shaping, skunk, Vannevar Bush
Comments Off on Shaping Science
The monopoly meme, 5
Now let’s turn to the Bayh-Dole Act and see how it works with the monopoly meme. Short form, if you don’t want to bother, is that Bayh-Dole doesn’t follow the monopoly meme in its gestures, but because these gestures never … Continue reading
The monopoly meme, 4
We are nearing the end of examining Howard Bremer’s Senate subcommittee testimony from 1979 on a bill that was remarkably like Bayh-Dole. Bremer’s testimony is useful in helping us get at the rhetorical effect of the monopoly meme–that without a … Continue reading
The monopoly meme, 3
We are working through Howard Bremer’s testimony before a Senate subcommittee with regard to a bill remarkably like what would become Bayh-Dole. The point is to explore how the monopoly meme works in practice. Bremer gives nine principles that ought … Continue reading
The monopoly meme, 2
To get at the rhetorical workings of the monopoly meme, we are working our way through Howard Bremer’s testimony before a Senate subcommittee discussing S. 1215, an alternative bill to Bayh-Dole that was being considered after S. 414 had failed … Continue reading
Who Owns Digital Learning Resources?–6
Let’s come back around to Hal Plotkin’s question–who owns digital learning resources? Plotkin wants the answer to be: certainly not the university bureaucrats aiming to “commercialize” everything and therefore putting everything behind a paywall. That makes sense. Bureaucrats don’t have … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Freedom, Open Source, Policy
Tagged Department of Education, digital learning resources
Comments Off on Who Owns Digital Learning Resources?–6
Who Owns Digital Learning Resources?–5
There’s a basic problem with federal grant support for research. I don’t know if the Department of Education has avoided this problem, but I will put it out there. If a federal agency supports both research and maintenance of contract deliverables, … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Freedom, Open Source, Policy, Projects
Tagged Department of Education, licensing, open
Comments Off on Who Owns Digital Learning Resources?–5
Who Owns Digital Learning Resources?–4
Now let’s deal with “digital” educational works in the context of university intellectual property claims. This is something I’ve spent a couple of decades dealing with. The Department of Education published its final rule in January 2017, requiring open licensing … Continue reading
Posted in Commons, Freedom, Open Source, Policy, Projects
Tagged Bayh-Dole, Department of Education, licensing, open
Comments Off on Who Owns Digital Learning Resources?–4
If state university patent policy is actually state law . . .
Over the course of a number of years, Professor Galen Suppes was involved in litigation with the University of Missouri over rights to inventions. Among other things, the University claimed ownership of inventions that Suppes made at another institution before … Continue reading
Posted in Freedom, IP, Litigation, Policy
Tagged California, invention, Missouri, Shaw, Suppes, university law
Comments Off on If state university patent policy is actually state law . . .