Category Archives: Bozonet

Illusions of Bayh-Dole: “manufactured substantially” 4

Previous articles in the series are here, here, and here. The series continues here and here. There’s a simple point to make about Bayh-Dole’s section 204 requirement that exclusive licenses to use or sell products based on a subject invention … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Illusions of Bayh-Dole: “manufactured substantially” 4

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 7

Frankly, I am weary of working through the HEAs’ nonsense advice to NIST. I expect you are too. Bullshit is so much more difficult to pin down than carefully reasoned discussion. It’s worth respecting carefully reasoned discussion, even if one … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 7

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 6

We are working through the advice that AAU, APLU, and other “higher education associations” have provided to NIST on how to improve federal laboratory technology transfer. Do you expect that these associations thoroughly vetted their draft response with all their … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 6

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 5

Higher education associations, led by AAU and APLU, give advice to NIST about ways to bolster federal technology transfer by telling NIST about non-federal university technology transfer. The HEAs have insisted that Bayh-Dole has been working as intended, which we … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 5

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 4

We are dealing with the bombast that AAU and other “higher education associations” put forward as advice to NIST with regard to how the federal government might better manage its own technology transfer. Instead, the HEAs seek to improve their … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Policy, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 4

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 3

A set of higher education associations–front groups for a bunch of research universities–has published their advice in response to NIST’s call for ways to improve federal technology transfer. AAU, APLU, AAMC, COGR, and ACE all signed on to the statement that … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 3

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 2

We are working through advice offered to NIST by various higher education associations on how to improve federal technology transfer by funding without oversight the “technology transfer” programs of non-federal institutions. If the gist is all you  need, then don’t … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Metrics, Open Source, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 2

AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 1

AAU has tweeted out its happiness with advice it and other “higher education associations” (APLU, AAMC, COGR, and ACE) have given in response to NIST’s call for public comment on ways to improve federal “technology transfer.” AAU tweets that “Bayh-Dole … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, Metrics, Policy | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on AAU, APLU, and others aim to “bolster” federal technology transfer, 1

Only Bayh-Dole and University Research Enterprise, 3

We are working through Bayh-Dole without the cover of the political bluffery that permitted Bayh-Dole to become national policy. Without the bluffery, Bayh-Dole addresses the same situation addressed previously by the IPA program, which in turn took up the Harbridge … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet, History | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Only Bayh-Dole and University Research Enterprise, 3

AUTM’s invitation to delude yourself, 5

We turn then to the final claim made by AUTM in its “talking points”–the stuff any advocate of Bayh-Dole ought to be repeating to legislators and faculty and anyone else appearing to lack sufficient self-delusion–that none of the fakery presented … Continue reading

Posted in Bayh-Dole, Bozonet | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on AUTM’s invitation to delude yourself, 5