Category Archives: Bad Science

Illusions of Bayh-Dole: the bathos of university practice, 2

We are working through a report on a workshop discussion of the “manufactured substantially” provision in Bayh-Dole (35 USC 204). Now we get to a rich part of Schwartz’s discussion, actual university practice: Because Johns Hopkins has applied for and … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science | Comments Off on Illusions of Bayh-Dole: the bathos of university practice, 2

Vice presidents for research beg for Directive 10-289.

Here’s a bit from the APLU/AAU fakographic on university technology transfer: And here’s a bit from “‘Miracle machine of U.S. innovation is in danger,” a new op/ed by Kelvin Droegemeier and Daniel Reed. Droegemeier is the vice president for research at … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, Metrics, Sponsored Research, Technology Transfer | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Vice presidents for research beg for Directive 10-289.

The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 10

This series starts here: The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 1 Medicinal chemistry drives the whole of federal patent policy The IPA program, revived in 1968 by the NIH following the Harbridge House report, which singled out medicinal chemistry … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, History, Policy, Sponsored Research | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The IPA and Wisconsin’s 1969 Patent Policy, 10

Boiling away “Why Bayh-Dole”

The basis of the patent system is individual inventor rights. Bayh-Dole strips these in favor of institutional exploitation. Bayh-Dole is inventor loathing. The results are terrible. Commercialization rates are 1/1oth what they were before Bayh-Dole. Bayh-Dole has created tens of … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science | Comments Off on Boiling away “Why Bayh-Dole”

Saving Bush

Over at the Science of Science Policy discussion group, there was a brief flurry regarding Dan Sarewitz’s article in The New Atlantis, “Saving Science.” Here is what I posted in that discussion: Militaristic research directors demanding disciplined obedience don’t appear … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, History | Comments Off on Saving Bush

Vannevar Bush’s seductive lie

At The New Atlantis, Dan Sarewitz has published an interesting article, “Saving Science.” While there’s plenty to discuss regarding his major theme, that scientists “must come out of the lab into the real world,” here I’d like to deal with a … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, Freedom, History, Innovation, Policy, Vannever Bush | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Look, It's a Thrush!

One of the biggest problems in dealing with university technology transfer is the propensity for people to reason from the names given to things, rather than what the things are. In biology, a truism is that one cannot reason from … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, Bayh-Dole, Freedom, Policy | Comments Off on Look, It's a Thrush!

How Bayh-Dole dammed, and then damned, the commons

This is the third article in a series. The first is here. The second, here. The motivating driver of the Bayh-Dole Act, if we can be blunt, was to put the affiliated research foundations in a position to keep with impunity any … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, Commons, History, Metrics, Policy | Comments Off on How Bayh-Dole dammed, and then damned, the commons

Embracing Bad Science in Technology Transfer

Julia Belluz and Steven Hoffman at Vox have published a new account of how screwed up academic science is. Belluz and Hoffman report on a string of studies and exposed forgeries that suggest that the published scientific literature is anything … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, Innovation, Policy | Comments Off on Embracing Bad Science in Technology Transfer

Replication: The Technology Transfer Problem

Steve Fiori on the SCISP listserv called the list’s attention to a blog post by David Funder, a research psychologist at UC Riverside.  Funder’s post discusses a recent NSF workshop that took up the issue of replication of research results. … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Science, Metrics, Technology Transfer | Comments Off on Replication: The Technology Transfer Problem