I’m still in shock having seen AUTM and WARF, among others, out proposing that Bayh-Dole pre-empts the normal vesting of ownership of inventions, and worse and worse arguing that doing so somehow supports academic freedom and therefore is noble. The implication is that university faculty are too damn stupid to be able to manage inventions made in their own research on their own, and for their own good, and the public’s benefit, organizations and universities appeal for a screwball interpretation of a federal law to make everything better. Despite faculty managing all other significant decisions relating to their research, apparently they are not able to do so with regard to inventions. Tell me it’s all a dream.
Search the RE article base
Top 48 Hour View List
- Exclusive licensing in Bayh-Dole, Part 1: Licenses and Assignments
- Illusions of Bayh-Dole: "manufactured substantially" 1
- Emory's Confusion Over Bayh-Dole and Copyright, 1
- Why is Bayh-Dole not part of the Federal Grants and Cooperative Agreements Act?
- The Cork in the Keg: Open Source Software Complies with Bayh-Dole But University Invention Practice Often Does Not